[#103241] [Ruby master Bug#17777] 2.6.7 fails to build on macOS: implicit declaration of function 'rb_native_mutex_destroy' is invalid in C99 — eregontp@...
Issue #17777 has been reported by Eregon (Benoit Daloze).
17 messages
2021/04/05
[#103305] [Ruby master Feature#17785] Allow named parameters to be keywords — marcandre-ruby-core@...
Issue #17785 has been reported by marcandre (Marc-Andre Lafortune).
21 messages
2021/04/08
[#103342] [Ruby master Feature#17790] Have a way to clear a String without resetting its capacity — jean.boussier@...
Issue #17790 has been reported by byroot (Jean Boussier).
14 messages
2021/04/09
[#103388] [ANN] Multi-factor Authentication of bugs.ruby-lang.org — SHIBATA Hiroshi <hsbt@...>
Hello,
5 messages
2021/04/12
[#103414] Re: [ANN] Multi-factor Authentication of bugs.ruby-lang.org
— Martin J. Dürst <duerst@...>
2021/04/13
SXMgdGhlcmUgYSB3YXkgdG8gdXNlIHRoaXMgbXVsdGktZmFjdG9yIGF1dGhlbnRpY2F0aW9uIGZv
[#103547] List of CI sites to check — Martin J. Dürst <duerst@...>
SGVsbG8gZXZlcnlib2R5LAoKRHVlIHRvIHZhcmlvdXMgcGVyc29uYWwgcmVhc29ucywgSSBoYXZl
4 messages
2021/04/22
[#103596] [Ruby master Feature#17830] Add Integer#previous and Integer#prev — rafasoaresms@...
Issue #17830 has been reported by rafasoares (Rafael Soares).
9 messages
2021/04/26
[ruby-core:103429] [Ruby master Feature#17016] Enumerable#scan_left
From:
finch.parker@...
Date:
2021-04-13 14:51:17 UTC
List:
ruby-core #103429
Issue #17016 has been updated by parker (Parker Finch). I like `#accumulate`, and thank you @nobu for an implementation [here](https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/3361)! Is there anything I can do to help us come to a decision on this one? ---------------------------------------- Feature #17016: Enumerable#scan_left https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/17016#change-91522 * Author: parker (Parker Finch) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal ---------------------------------------- ## Proposal Add a `#scan_left` method to `Enumerable`. (The name "scan_left" is based on Scala's scanLeft and Haskell's scanl. It seems like "scan_left" would be a ruby-ish name for this concept, but I'm curious if there are other thoughts on naming here!) ## Background `#scan_left` is similar to `#inject`, but it accumulates the partial results that are computed. As a comparison: ``` [1, 2, 3].inject(0, &:+) => 6 [1, 2, 3].scan_left(0, &:+) => [0, 1, 3, 6] ``` Notably, the `scan_left` operation can be done lazily since it doesn't require processing the entire collection before computing a value. I recently described `#scan_left`, and its relationship to `#inject`, more thoroughly in [this blog post](https://medium.com/building-panorama-education/scan-left-a-lazy-incremental-alternative-to-inject-f6e946f74c00). ## Reasoning We heavily rely on the scan operation. We use an [event-sourcing](https://martinfowler.com/eaaDev/EventSourcing.html) pattern, which means that we are scanning over individual "events" and building up the corresponding state. We rely on the history of states and need to do this lazily (we stream events because they cannot fit in memory). Thus the scan operation is much more applicable than the inject operation. We suspect that there are many applications that could leverage the scan operation. [This question](https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1475808/cumulative-array-sum-in-ruby) would be more easily answered by `#scan_left`. It is a natural fit for any application that needs to store the incrementally-computed values of an `#inject`, and a requirement for an application that needs to use `#inject` while maintaining laziness. ## Implementation There is a Ruby implementation of this functionality [here](https://github.com/panorama-ed/scan_left/) and an implementation in C [here](https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/3078). ## Counterarguments Introducing a new public method is committing to maintenance going forward and expands the size of the Ruby codebase -- it should not be done lightly. I think that providing the functionality here is worth the tradeoff, but I understand any hesitation to add yet more to Ruby! ---Files-------------------------------- scan_left_example.rb (2.93 KB) -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/ Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe> <http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>