[#39810] 2.0 feature questionnaire — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
I made a questionnaire "What do you want to introduce in 2.0?" in my
2011/10/1 SASADA Koichi <[email protected]>:
Hi,
On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 1:30 AM, Yukihiro Matsumoto <[email protected]> wro=
Oops, I was mentioned.
See below.
(10/07/2011 02:19 PM), Evan Phoenix wrote:
>> No, it isn't. =A0MVM-aware extensions shall obey the MVM-safe APIs.
2011/10/1 SASADA Koichi <[email protected]>:
On Monday, October 24, 2011 at 10:29 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 10:29 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter <[email protected]
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 3:51 PM, Rocky Bernstein <[email protected]> wrote:
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 1:51 PM, Rocky Bernstein <[email protected]>wrote:
[#39823] Discussion results — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
Hi,
I did not have the fortune of attending the discussion, but I would
Hi,
Hello Matz,
Hello,
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 8:16 AM, Yusuke Endoh <[email protected]> wrote:
How does String#margin behave when given irregular input?
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 11:05 AM, Jim Freeze <[email protected]> wrote:
Sent from my iPad
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 1:52 PM, Gmail <[email protected]> wrote:
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 14:16, Yusuke Endoh <[email protected]> wrote:
[#39824] Road to 2.0 — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
Hi,
Hello,
[#39886] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5393][Open] some style fixes in enum.c docs — b t <redmine@...>
[#39888] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5394][Open] Anonymous Symbols, Anonymous Methods — Kurt Stephens <ks.ruby@...>
[#39915] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5400][Open] Remove flip-flops in 2.0 — Magnus Holm <judofyr@...>
Hello,
[#39918] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5401][Open] Ruby 1.9.3 interpreter crash — Conrad Taylor <conradwt@...>
[#39937] redmine 2.0 tracker — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
There is no 2.0 tracker (sub-project) in redmine.
[#39957] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5407][Open] Cannot build ruby-1.9.3-rc1 with TDM-GCC 4.6.1 on Windows XP SP3 — Heesob Park <phasis@...>
[#39986] problems with Refinements — Shugo Maeda <shugo@...>
Hi,
There are also the group of people that think refinements are just a
Hi,
> Unfortunately, I missed Brian's talk, so we have to wait until the
Hi,
> I am not sure why
[#39993] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #2348] RBTree Should be Added to the Standard Library — David Graham <david.malcom.graham@...>
(2011.10.07 01:50 ), David Graham wrote:
On 07/10/2011, at 1:16 PM, Kenta Murata wrote:
(2011/10/07 1:50), David Graham wrote:
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 6:34 PM, SASADA Koichi <[email protected]> wrote:
[#40058] Statistical Profiling — Perry Smith <pedzsan@...>
Would it be plausible to somehow, get the (ruby) stack of the running =
[#40073] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5427][Open] Not complex patch to improve `require` time (load.c) — Yura Sokolov <funny.falcon@...>
[#40117] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5437][Open] Using fibers leads to huge memory leak — Robert Pankowecki <robert.pankowecki@...>
[#40172] plans for 2.0. — Carter Cheng <cartercheng@...>
Hello,
2011/10/17 Carter Cheng <[email protected]>:
[#40188] [Ruby 2.0 - Feature #5454] keyword arguments — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
This looks very interesting=21 Would someone be willing to translate to e=
Hi,
Hi,
Thanks for the translation=21
RnJvbSB0aGUgY3VycmVudCBwYXRjaCBpdCBzZWVtcyB0byBtZSB0aGF0IHRoaXMgd291bGQgcmFp
[#40200] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5459][Open] Silence -Wmissing-declarations and -Wold-style-definition warnings in mkmf — Nikolai Weibull <now@...>
[#40203] invoking garbage_collect in gc.c — Carter Cheng <cartercheng@...>
Hello,
[#40259] Counseling — Perry Smith <pedzsan@...>
Ruby and I are back in counseling... Its always the same thing with =
What's your $LC_CTYPE? What OS are you on?
Hi all,
Gon軋lo Silva wrote:
On Oct 21, 2011, at 9:43 AM, Perry Smith wrote:
To try and cut to the core of the issue: in Ruby 1.8 it was common practi=
> What Ruby needs (IMHO), is the equivalent of Obj-C's NSData class. That is,
On Saturday, October 22, 2011 at 12:43 PM, Jon wrote:
[#40271] Can rubygems save us from "binary-compatibility hell"? — Yusuke Endoh <mame@...>
Hello, rubygems developers --
Forwarding this again to ruby-core as received a postmaster delivery failur=
Hello,
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 4:38 PM, Yusuke Endoh <[email protected]> wrote:
Hello,
2011/11/10 Yusuke Endoh <[email protected]>:
Hello,
Dne 22.10.2011 4:48, Yusuke Endoh napsal(a):
On Oct 31, 2011, at 2:41 PM, V=EDt Ondruch wrote:
Dne 1.11.2011 0:05, Eric Hodel napsal(a):
On Nov 1, 2011, at 2:03 PM, V=EDt Ondruch wrote:
[#40281] [Ruby 2.0 - Bug #5470][Open] r33507 and r33508 break the build under MinGW — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...>
[#40284] set_trace_func changed? — Intransition <transfire@...>
Did something change about `set_trace_func` between 1.8.7 and 1.9.3?
[#40290] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5474][Assigned] keyword argument — Yusuke Endoh <mame@...>
Hi,
Hi,
See below.
Hi,
> |> It's Python way, and I won't take it.
More refinement below. I think we're on a good path here.
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 2:08 PM, Yukihiro Matsumoto <[email protected]>wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 7:30 PM, Yukihiro Matsumoto <[email protected]> wr=
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 3:16 AM, Nobuyoshi Nakada <[email protected]> wrot=
Hi,
[#40311] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5478][Open] import Set into core, add syntax — Konstantin Haase <Konstantin.Haase@...>
On 2011-12-04, at 16:15:00, Alexey Muranov wrote:
[#40312] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5479][Open] import StringIO into core, add String#to_io — Konstantin Haase <Konstantin.Haase@...>
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 10:14:54PM +0900, Charles Nutter wrote:
My main request was to add String#to_io, as Aaron described, so this protoc=
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 02:22:21AM +0900, Haase, Konstantin wrote:
[#40314] [ANN] 2011 Call for grant proposals — Shugo Maeda <shugo@...>
Hello,
Hello,
> Ruby reference manual for you, me and everyoneApplicant: Yutaka Hara
[#40316] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5481][Open] Gemifying Ruby standard library — Hiroshi Nakamura <nakahiro@...>
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 14:45, Intransition <[email protected]> wrote:
[#40322] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5482][Open] Rubinius as basis for Ruby 2.0 — Thomas Sawyer <transfire@...>
Come back when all 1.9 features and callcc are implemented :-)
(2011/10/25 12:46), Yusuke Endoh wrote:
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 9:58 PM, SASADA Koichi <[email protected]> wrote:
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 11:45 PM, Tim Felgentreff <[email protected]> wrote:
[#40356] JIT development for MRI — Carter Cheng <cartercheng@...>
Hello,
Hello Charlie,
Hi,
Dear Koichi SASADA,
I noticed that you used context threading in YARV. Do you have some analysis
Thanks for reference.
Thanks Koichi.
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 6:43 PM, Carter Cheng <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi Carter,
Thanks Koichi. How do profiling based approaches differ from trace recording
[#40412] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5486][Open] rb_stat() doesn’t respect input encoding — Nikolai Weibull <now@...>
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 07:28, Usaku NAKAMURA <[email protected]> wrote=
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 08:14, Nikolai Weibull <[email protected]> wrote:
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 22:41, Nobuyoshi Nakada <[email protected]> wrote:
Hello,
2012/3/15 U.Nakamura <[email protected]>:
[#40427] cfp consistency error — Aaron Patterson <tenderlove@...>
Hi, I'm getting a cfp consistency error when I use trunk ruby. Here is
[#40453] Test case format — Jon <jon.forums@...>
I see no mention of a required (or preferred) test case format after reviewing:
2011/10/27 Jon <[email protected]>:
[#40489] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5497][Open] Math.log10(10_000) error on HP-UX/PA — The Written Word Inc <bugs-ruby@...>
[#40492] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5505][Open] BasicObject#__extend__ — Thomas Sawyer <transfire@...>
[#40527] [ANN] Ruby 1.9.3-p0 is out — "Yuki Sonoda (Yugui)" <yugui@...>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hello,
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 11:11 PM, Luis Lavena <[email protected]> wrote:
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 11:20 AM, Yugui <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 11:20 AM, Yugui <[email protected]> wrote:
[#40562] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5525][Open] UDPSocket#bind(ip, port) fails under IPv6 => Errno::EAFNOSUPPORT — Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@...>
[#40571] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5529][Open] Bus error with Fibers on OSX Lion — Dave Thomas <dave@...>
[#40586] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5531][Open] deep_value for dealing with nested hashes — Kyle Peyton <kylepeyton@...>
[ruby-core:40229] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5244] Continuation causes Bus Error on Debian sparc
Issue #5244 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.
knu says that 'flushw' is correct for SparcV9, but not 'ta 0x03'.
And your platform seems 32bit, right?
Then why defined(__sparc_v9__) || defined(__sparcv9) || defined(__arch64__) is true?
Can't you show the result from:
$ gcc -E -dM -xc /dev/null | grep -i -e sparc -e arch64
----------------------------------------
Bug #5244: Continuation causes Bus Error on Debian sparc
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/5244
Author: Lucas Nussbaum
Status: Open
Priority: Normal
Assignee: Naohisa Goto
Category:
Target version:
ruby -v: -
Hi,
$ ./miniruby -I./lib -I. -I.ext/common ./tool/runruby.rb --extout=.ext -rcontinuation -e 'callcc { |c| c.call }'
-e:1: [BUG] Bus Error
ruby 1.9.3dev (2011-08-26) [sparc-linux]
-- Control frame information -----------------------------------------------
c:0004 p:---- s:0009 b:0009 l:000008 d:000008 CFUNC :callcc
c:0003 p:0009 s:0006 b:0006 l:000fcc d:001d74 EVAL -e:1
c:0002 p:---- s:0004 b:0004 l:000003 d:000003 FINISH
c:0001 p:0000 s:0002 b:0002 l:000fcc d:000fcc TOP
-- Ruby level backtrace information ----------------------------------------
-e:1:in `<main>'
-e:1:in `callcc'
-- C level backtrace information -------------------------------------------
Bus error
gdb says:
(gdb) run -I./lib -I. -I.ext/common ./tool/runruby.rb --extout=.ext -rcontinuation -e 'callcc { |c| c.call }'
Starting program: /home/lucas/ruby1.9.1-1.9.3~preview1+svn33077/miniruby -I./lib -I. -I.ext/common ./tool/runruby.rb --extout=.ext -rcontinuation -e 'callcc { |c| c.call }'
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread 0xf7fc7b70 (LWP 31418)]
[Thread 0xf7fc7b70 (LWP 31418) exited]
process 31417 is executing new program: /home/lucas/ruby1.9.1-1.9.3~preview1+svn33077/ruby1.9.1
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread 0xf79e5b70 (LWP 31419)]
Program received signal SIGBUS, Bus error.
0xf7f4d304 in cont_capture (stat=Cannot access memory at address 0x49
) at cont.c:439
439 if (ruby_setjmp(cont->jmpbuf)) {
(gdb) print cont
Cannot access memory at address 0xfffffff9
--
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org