[#59445] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9335][Open] dynamic rescue regression in Ruby 2.1 — "fdr (Daniel Farina)" <daniel@...>
6 messages
2014/01/01
[#59448] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9335][Rejected] dynamic rescue regression in Ruby 2.1
— "nobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada)" <nobu@...>
2014/01/01
[#59462] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9342][Open] [PATCH] SizedQueue#clear does not notify waiting threads in Ruby 1.9.3 — "jsc (Justin Collins)" <redmine@...>
9 messages
2014/01/02
[#59466] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9343][Open] [PATCH] SizedQueue#max= wakes up waiters properly — "normalperson (Eric Wong)" <normalperson@...>
11 messages
2014/01/02
[#60513] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9343] [PATCH] SizedQueue#max= wakes up waiters properly
— normalperson@...
2014/02/05
Issue #9343 has been updated by Eric Wong.
[#59498] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9352][Open] [BUG] rb_sys_fail_str(connect(2) for [fe80::1%lo0]:3000) - errno == 0 — "kain (Claudio Poli)" <claudio@...>
10 messages
2014/01/03
[#59516] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9356][Open] TCPSocket.new does not seem to handle INTR — "charliesome (Charlie Somerville)" <charliesome@...>
48 messages
2014/01/03
[#59546] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9356] TCPSocket.new does not seem to handle INTR
— "charliesome (Charlie Somerville)" <charliesome@...>
2014/01/04
[#60863] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9356] TCPSocket.new does not seem to handle INTR
— shugo@...
2014/02/19
Issue #9356 has been updated by Shugo Maeda.
[#59517] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9357][Open] TracePoint's c_return traces return from call to 'trace' — "andhapp (Anuj Dutta)" <anuj@...>
5 messages
2014/01/03
[#59538] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9362][Assigned] Minimize cache misshit to gain optimal speed — "shyouhei (Shyouhei Urabe)" <shyouhei@...>
33 messages
2014/01/03
[#59541] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #9362][Assigned] Minimize cache misshit to gain optimal speed
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2014/01/04
Hi, I noticed a trivial typo in array.c, and it fails building struct.c
[#59542] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #9362][Assigned] Minimize cache misshit to gain optimal speed
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2014/01/04
Eric Wong <[email protected]> wrote:
[#59543] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #9362][Assigned] Minimize cache misshit to gain optimal speed
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2014/01/04
Btw, I just pushed a few trivial fixes up (a few more failures below):
[#59545] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #9362][Assigned] Minimize cache misshit to gain optimal speed
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2014/01/04
OK, last update of the night :o I think everything is good on 32-bit...
[#59551] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #9362][Assigned] Minimize cache misshit to gain optimal speed
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2014/01/04
Eric Wong <[email protected]> wrote:
[#59565] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #9362][Assigned] Minimize cache misshit to gain optimal speed
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2014/01/06
Btw, I started working on cachelined-time branch on git://80x24.org/ruby
[#59566] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #9362][Assigned] Minimize cache misshit to gain optimal speed
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2014/01/06
Eric Wong <[email protected]> wrote:
[#59567] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #9362][Assigned] Minimize cache misshit to gain optimal speed
— Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...>
2014/01/06
On 01/06/2014 12:02 PM, Eric Wong wrote:
[#59568] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #9362][Assigned] Minimize cache misshit to gain optimal speed
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2014/01/06
Urabe Shyouhei <[email protected]> wrote:
[#59582] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #9362][Assigned] Minimize cache misshit to gain optimal speed
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2014/01/06
Intersting challenge.
[#59585] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #9362][Assigned] Minimize cache misshit to gain optimal speed
— Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...>
2014/01/06
On 01/06/2014 04:52 PM, SASADA Koichi wrote:
[#59594] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #9362][Assigned] Minimize cache misshit to gain optimal speed
— Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...>
2014/01/06
On 01/06/2014 06:11 PM, Urabe Shyouhei wrote:
[#59605] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #9362][Assigned] Minimize cache misshit to gain optimal speed
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2014/01/06
(2014/01/06 23:10), Urabe Shyouhei wrote:
[#59630] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #9362][Assigned] Minimize cache misshit to gain optimal speed
— Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...>
2014/01/07
On 01/07/2014 07:36 AM, SASADA Koichi wrote:
[#59564] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9365][Open] Sporadic TypeError (wrong argument type Thread (expected VM/thread)) from IO#close (via Net:HTTP) — "ggiesemann (Geoffrey Giesemann)" <geoffwa@...>
6 messages
2014/01/05
[#60151] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9365] Sporadic TypeError (wrong argument type Thread (expected VM/thread)) from IO#close (via Net:HTTP)
— geoffwa@...
2014/01/28
Issue #9365 has been updated by Geoffrey Giesemann.
[#59728] Ruby 2.1.0 in Production: known bugs and patches — Aman Gupta <[email protected]>
Last week, we upgraded the github.com rails app to ruby 2.1.0 in production.
6 messages
2014/01/13
[#59733] Re: Ruby 2.1.0 in Production: known bugs and patches
— "Martin J. Dürst" <duerst@...>
2014/01/13
Hello Aman,
[#59770] bug report did not propagate to ruby-core — Mean Login <meanlogin@...>
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/9416
4 messages
2014/01/15
[#59791] About unmarshallable DRb objects life-time — Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@...>
A while ago I created a proof-of-concept that I intended to use in my
16 messages
2014/01/15
[#59794] Re: About unmarshallable DRb objects life-time
— Eric Hodel <[email protected]>
2014/01/15
On 15 Jan 2014, at 11:58, Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <[email protected]> =
[#59808] Re: About unmarshallable DRb objects life-time
— Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@...>
2014/01/16
Em 15-01-2014 19:42, Eric Hodel escreveu:
[#59810] Re: About unmarshallable DRb objects life-time
— Eric Hodel <[email protected]>
2014/01/16
On 16 Jan 2014, at 02:15, Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <[email protected]> =
[#59826] Re: About unmarshallable DRb objects life-time
— Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@...>
2014/01/17
Em 16-01-2014 19:43, Eric Hodel escreveu:
[#59832] Re: About unmarshallable DRb objects life-time
— Eric Hodel <[email protected]>
2014/01/17
On 17 Jan 2014, at 04:22, Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <[email protected]> =
[#59860] Re: About unmarshallable DRb objects life-time
— Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@...>
2014/01/18
Em 17-01-2014 19:53, Eric Hodel escreveu:
[#59915] Re: About unmarshallable DRb objects life-time
— Eric Hodel <[email protected]>
2014/01/20
On 18 Jan 2014, at 15:12, Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <[email protected]> =
[#59929] Re: About unmarshallable DRb objects life-time
— Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@...>
2014/01/21
Em 20-01-2014 21:51, Eric Hodel escreveu:
[#59937] Re: About unmarshallable DRb objects life-time
— Eric Hodel <[email protected]>
2014/01/21
On 21 Jan 2014, at 02:01, Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <[email protected]> =
[#59974] Re: About unmarshallable DRb objects life-time
— Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@...>
2014/01/22
Em 21-01-2014 19:36, Eric Hodel escreveu:
[#59807] [ruby-trunk - misc #9421] [Open] [PATCH] doc/contributing.rdoc: allow/encourage other git hosts — normalperson@...
Issue #9421 has been reported by Eric Wong.
5 messages
2014/01/16
[#59882] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9428] [Rejected] Inline argument expressions and re-assignment — matz@...
Issue #9428 has been updated by Yukihiro Matsumoto.
4 messages
2014/01/20
[#59896] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #9428] [Rejected] Inline argument expressions and re-assignment
— "Martin J. Dürst" <duerst@...>
2014/01/20
On 2014/01/20 11:32, [email protected] wrote:
[#59909] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9425] [PATCH] st: use power-of-two sizes to avoid slow modulo ops — shyouhei@...
Issue #9425 has been updated by Shyouhei Urabe.
4 messages
2014/01/20
[#59917] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #9425] [PATCH] st: use power-of-two sizes to avoid slow modulo ops
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2014/01/21
[email protected] wrote:
[#60229] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9427] [Feedback] [PATCH] io.c: remove socket check for sendfile — akr@...
Issue #9427 has been updated by Akira Tanaka.
3 messages
2014/01/29
[#60377] Re: [ruby-cvs:51920] nobu:r44775 (trunk): socket.c: suppress warnings — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
[email protected] wrote:
3 messages
2014/01/31
[ruby-core:59897] Re: [ruby-trunk - misc #9215] Maintenance Policy for Future Releases (2.1.0 & beyond)
From:
"Martin J. Dürst" <duerst@...>
Date:
2014-01-20 10:39:33 UTC
List:
ruby-core #59897
Hello Zachary, From the comments from Yui, it looks like the policy should be split up=20 into an internal (for Ruby commiters, and in particular those in charge=20 of releases,...) and an external (for users) part. Also, please note that because Ruby isn't a company, we have to be=20 careful with commitments. It's clear that for Ruby users, the more and=20 the more explicit commitments there are, the better. But on the other=20 hand, everybody, in particular also people in charge of releases, are=20 just volunteers. They may be able to use some of their company's time,=20 but that may change. They may use some of their free time, but that may=20 also change. So with respect to release and support policy, it's very important to=20 get the okay of the actual person in charge. Matz may be okay with some=20 release or support policy, but if the actual person in charge isn't okay=20 with it, that won't help. Of course it's always possible that companies explicitly commit support=20 for some version of Ruby (that has e.g. happened for Ruby 1.8.7), and I=20 think it would be good if any related document such as a release policy=20 would mention this possibility. Regards, Martin. On 2014/01/20 15:43, [email protected] wrote: > Issue #9215 has been updated by Yui NARUSE. > > >> We'd like to take a minute and discuss our plans for ruby-core support= ed maintenance periods of Ruby. > > "take a minute and discuss" is not useful for users. It should be simpl= y "We release" or "decide" or something. > >> backports will be made to the `ruby_MAJOR_MINOR` branch > > this information is not for users. > > >> The ruby-core team is responsible for a proper End-of-Life for each `M= INOR` version of Ruby. >> >> Our current format is to assign a maintainer for each `MINOR` series o= f Ruby. It's important to note that this person is not obligated to commi= t for the entire 3 year suggested maintenance period. >> >> Our main goal to avoid sudden death. > > What do you want to say in these paragraph? > If this is announce, the audience is users. > They read this, "We want to avoid sudden death". > "ah, ok... and what ruby-core will do?" > > The content is just a memorandum. > > See also rails' maintenance policy: http://weblog.rubyonrails.org/2013/= 2/24/maintenance-policy-for-ruby-on-rails/ > or you should see other policies. > >> Any decision made on Ruby development is based on the consensus of rub= y-core as a team. The decision must be implicitly or explicitly approved = by members of the maintenance policy team: > > This is not for users, just for you, zzak. > > ---------------------------------------- > misc #9215: Maintenance Policy for Future Releases (2.1.0& beyond) > https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/9215#change-44446 > > * Author: Terence Lee > * Status: Feedback > * Priority: Normal > * Assignee: Zachary Scott > * Category: doc > * Target version: 2.1.0 > ---------------------------------------- > In order to support long lived applications better, people need informa= tion to make decisions. When someone chooses to use a particular programm= ing language it=E2=80=99s important to know how long something is going t= o be supported. > > For future releases it=E2=80=99d be great if we could provide a formal = end of life window upon release. This would allow companies to be able to= make decisions on how long something will be supported. For instance, wh= en Ruby 2.1.0 comes out this Christmas, giving an expectation that suppor= t will be stopped by 12/25/2015 gives an accurate picture of how much tim= e must be allocated to upgrading, how urgent it will be, or if Ruby is ev= en the right language for the project. > > >