I noticed that in case of cache misshit, re-calculated cc->me can
be the same method entry than the pevious one. That is an okay
situation but can't we partially reuse the cache, because cc->call
should still be valid then?
One thing that has to be special-cased is when the method entry
gets amended by some refinements. That happens behind-the-scene
of call cache mechanism. We have to check if cc->me->def points to
the previously saved one.
Calculating -------------------------------------
trunk ours
vm2_poly_same_method 1.534M 2.025M i/s - 6.000M times in 3.910203s 2.962752s
Added by shyouhei (Shyouhei Urabe) almost 6 years ago
reuse cc->call
I noticed that in case of cache misshit, re-calculated cc->me can
be the same method entry than the pevious one. That is an okay
situation but can't we partially reuse the cache, because cc->call
should still be valid then?
One thing that has to be special-cased is when the method entry
gets amended by some refinements. That happens behind-the-scene
of call cache mechanism. We have to check if cc->me->def points to
the previously saved one.
Calculating -------------------------------------
trunk ours
vm2_poly_same_method 1.534M 2.025M i/s - 6.000M times in 3.910203s 2.962752s
Comparison:
vm2_poly_same_method
ours: 2025143.9 i/s
trunk: 1534447.2 i/s - 1.32x slower