Doc: Fix misleading wording of CRL parameters
authorDaniel Gustafsson <[email protected]>
Fri, 3 Dec 2021 13:15:50 +0000 (14:15 +0100)
committerDaniel Gustafsson <[email protected]>
Fri, 3 Dec 2021 13:15:50 +0000 (14:15 +0100)
commit7d0229e89f4f210aa273600eef65ef45be4c11c1
tree382d86c7f09bea29d4e11dad544943c5ea68fba4
parent429faf9ed52d7e8c321d9b28a989efbbb7f478d0
Doc: Fix misleading wording of CRL parameters

ssl_crl_file and ssl_crl_dir are both used to for client certificate
revocation, not server certificates.  The description for the params
could be easily misread to mean the opposite however,  as evidenced
by the bugreport leading to this fix.  Similarly, expand sslcrl and
and sslcrldir to explicitly mention server certificates. While there
also mention sslcrldir where previously only sslcrl was discussed.

Backpatch down to v10, with the CRL dir fixes down to 14 where they
were introduced.

Author: Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Peter Eisentraut <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20211202.135441.590555657708629486[email protected]
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CABWY_HCBUCjY1EJHrEGePGEaSZ5b29apgTohCyygtsqe_ySYng@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 10
doc/src/sgml/config.sgml
doc/src/sgml/libpq.sgml