Make ecpg's rjulmdy() and rmdyjul() agree with their declarations.

We had "short *mdy" in the extern declarations, but "short mdy[3]"
in the actual function definitions.  Per C99 these are equivalent,
but recent versions of gcc have started to issue warnings about
the inconsistency.  Clean it up before the warnings get any more
widespread.

Back-patch, in case anyone wants to build older PG versions with
bleeding-edge compilers.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2401575.1611764534@sss.pgh.pa.us

diff --git a/src/interfaces/ecpg/compatlib/informix.c b/src/interfaces/ecpg/compatlib/informix.c
index 2508ed9b8f47b70e38b56cdbfcefa7a111e0ab13..ae35fb8c5596d70daf90faf80342cd2c0ce2dd71 100644 (file)
--- a/src/interfaces/ecpg/compatlib/informix.c
+++ b/src/interfaces/ecpg/compatlib/informix.c
@@ -533,7 +533,7 @@ rtoday(date * d)
 }
 
 int
-rjulmdy(date d, short mdy[3])
+rjulmdy(date d, short *mdy)
 {
    int         mdy_int[3];
 
@@ -584,7 +584,7 @@ rfmtdate(date d, char *fmt, char *str)
 }
 
 int
-rmdyjul(short mdy[3], date * d)
+rmdyjul(short *mdy, date * d)
 {
    int         mdy_int[3];