This is purely cosmetic, as dsm_attach() interprets its argument as
a dsm_handle (i.e., an unsigned integer), but we might as well fix
it.
Oversight in commit
4db3744f1f.
Author: Jianghua Yang <
[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAAZLFmRxkUD5jRs0W3K%3DUe4_ZS%2BRcAb0PCE1S0vVJBn3sWH2UQ%40mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 13
* exit, which is fine. If there were a ResourceOwner, it would acquire
* ownership of the mapping, but we have no need for that.
*/
- seg = dsm_attach(DatumGetInt32(main_arg));
+ seg = dsm_attach(DatumGetUInt32(main_arg));
if (seg == NULL)
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_OBJECT_NOT_IN_PREREQUISITE_STATE),