From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2021 16:17:13 +0000 (-0500)
Subject: Make ecpg's rjulmdy() and rmdyjul() agree with their declarations.
X-Git-Tag: REL_10_16~10
X-Git-Url: http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=46371600aa2dac11ce6a8bcc314e5e037fb7ff9c;p=postgresql.git

Make ecpg's rjulmdy() and rmdyjul() agree with their declarations.

We had "short *mdy" in the extern declarations, but "short mdy[3]"
in the actual function definitions.  Per C99 these are equivalent,
but recent versions of gcc have started to issue warnings about
the inconsistency.  Clean it up before the warnings get any more
widespread.

Back-patch, in case anyone wants to build older PG versions with
bleeding-edge compilers.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2401575.1611764534@sss.pgh.pa.us
---

diff --git a/src/interfaces/ecpg/compatlib/informix.c b/src/interfaces/ecpg/compatlib/informix.c
index 2508ed9b8f4..ae35fb8c559 100644
--- a/src/interfaces/ecpg/compatlib/informix.c
+++ b/src/interfaces/ecpg/compatlib/informix.c
@@ -533,7 +533,7 @@ rtoday(date * d)
 }
 
 int
-rjulmdy(date d, short mdy[3])
+rjulmdy(date d, short *mdy)
 {
 	int			mdy_int[3];
 
@@ -584,7 +584,7 @@ rfmtdate(date d, char *fmt, char *str)
 }
 
 int
-rmdyjul(short mdy[3], date * d)
+rmdyjul(short *mdy, date * d)
 {
 	int			mdy_int[3];