Skip to content

Tutorials and Walkthrough #2991

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
JacopoPan opened this issue Aug 30, 2020 · 6 comments
Open

Tutorials and Walkthrough #2991

JacopoPan opened this issue Aug 30, 2020 · 6 comments

Comments

@JacopoPan
Copy link
Contributor

JacopoPan commented Aug 30, 2020

I tried tor write a couple of extremely simple, self-contained (Linux/Ubuntu) tutorials on

If anyone wants to check them out/correct me on anything I did wrong

I was motivated in part by the fact that I found the documentation on https://microsoft.github.io/AirSim/ to be a bit scattered but, more importantly, some of it is as old as 5 years, while some was updated as recently last month: is there any plan to re-factor/simplify/make current the existing body of documentation?

@jonyMarino
Copy link
Collaborator

@JacopoPan excellent initiative! We are very interested in these types of contributions. I will be looking at it and coming back to you soon.

@JacopoPan
Copy link
Contributor Author

@jonyMarino I was happy to see this had positive feedback: if you think there are certain parts I should/could polish and make into a PR, please let me know

@jonyMarino
Copy link
Collaborator

@JacopoPan It seems to us that this documentation corresponds to different sections of the current documentation. We will see it well and return to you

@JacopoPan
Copy link
Contributor Author

JacopoPan commented Sep 15, 2020

@jonyMarino yes, of course: there are some additional terminal snippets, information I learned from open and closed Issues, and the custom pawn instructions and RLlib integration are new) but, as I wrote in the first message, one of the (I believe) limits of the existing documentation is how scattered across pages it currently is (and that's something I think it would be useful for the community to address)

@jonyMarino
Copy link
Collaborator

@JacopoPan Sorry for the delays in incorporating your contribution. We are making efforts so that the contributions of the community are incorporated more quickly. Could you make a pull request for this and we continue there? It will get more attention if you do that

@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Apr 17, 2022

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had activity from the community in the last year. It will be closed if no further activity occurs within 20 days.

@stale stale bot added the stale label Apr 17, 2022
@jonyMarino jonyMarino removed the stale label May 2, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants