Configurations

The Java Operator SDK (JOSDK) provides several abstractions that work great out of the box. However, while we strive to cover the most common cases with the default behavior, we also recognize that that default behavior is not always what any given user might want for their operator. Numerous configuration options are therefore provided to help people tailor the framework to their needs.

Configuration options act at several levels, depending on which behavior you wish to act upon:

  • Operator-level using ConfigurationService
  • Reconciler-level using ControllerConfiguration
  • DependentResouce-level using the DependentResourceConfigurator interface
  • EventSource-level: some event sources, such as InformerEventSource, might need to be fine-tuned to properly identify which events will trigger the associated reconciler.

Operator-level configuration

Configuration that impacts the whole operator is performed via the ConfigurationService class. ConfigurationService is an abstract class, and the implementation can be different based on which flavor of the framework is used. For example Quarkus Operator SDK replaces the default implementation. Configurations are initialized with sensible defaults, but can be changed during initialization.

For instance, if you wish to not validate that the CRDs are present on your cluster when the operator starts and configure leader election, you would do something similar to:

Operator operator = new Operator( override -> override
        .checkingCRDAndValidateLocalModel(false)
        .withLeaderElectionConfiguration(new LeaderElectionConfiguration("bar", "barNS")));

Reconciler-level configuration

While reconcilers are typically configured using the @ControllerConfiguration annotation, it is also possible to override the configuration at runtime, when the reconciler is registered with the operator instance, either by passing it a completely new ControllerConfiguration instance or by preferably overriding some aspects of the current configuration using a ControllerConfigurationOverrider Consumer:

Operator operator;
Reconciler reconciler;
...
operator.register(reconciler, configOverrider ->
        configOverrider.withFinalizer("my-nifty-operator/finalizer").withLabelSelector("foo=bar"));

Dynamically Changing Target Namespaces

A controller can be configured to watch a specific set of namespaces in addition of the namespace in which it is currently deployed or the whole cluster. The framework supports dynamically changing the list of these namespaces while the operator is running. When a reconciler is registered, an instance of RegisteredController is returned, providing access to the methods allowing users to change watched namespaces as the operator is running.

A typical scenario would probably involve extracting the list of target namespaces from a ConfigMap or some other input but this part is out of the scope of the framework since this is use-case specific. For example, reacting to changes to a ConfigMap would probably involve registering an associated Informer and then calling the changeNamespaces method on RegisteredController.


public static void main(String[] args) {
    KubernetesClient client = new DefaultKubernetesClient();
    Operator operator = new Operator(client);
    RegisteredController registeredController = operator.register(new WebPageReconciler(client));
    operator.installShutdownHook();
    operator.start();

    // call registeredController further while operator is running
}

If watched namespaces change for a controller, it might be desirable to propagate these changes to InformerEventSources associated with the controller. In order to express this, InformerEventSource implementations interested in following such changes need to be configured appropriately so that the followControllerNamespaceChanges method returns true:


@ControllerConfiguration
public class MyReconciler implements Reconciler<TestCustomResource> {

   @Override
   public Map<String, EventSource> prepareEventSources(
      EventSourceContext<ChangeNamespaceTestCustomResource> context) {

    InformerEventSource<ConfigMap, TestCustomResource> configMapES =
        new InformerEventSource<>(InformerEventSourceConfiguration.from(ConfigMap.class, TestCustomResource.class)
            .withNamespacesInheritedFromController(context)
            .build(), context);

    return EventSourceUtils.nameEventSources(configMapES);
  }

}

As seen in the above code snippet, the informer will have the initial namespaces inherited from controller, but also will adjust the target namespaces if it changes for the controller.

See also the integration test for this feature.

DependentResource-level configuration

It is possible to define custom annotations to configure custom DependentResource implementations. In order to provide such a configuration mechanism for your own DependentResource implementations, they must be annotated with the @Configured annotation. This annotation defines 3 fields that tie everything together:

  • by, which specifies which annotation class will be used to configure your dependents,
  • with, which specifies the class holding the configuration object for your dependents and
  • converter, which specifies the ConfigurationConverter implementation in charge of converting the annotation specified by the by field into objects of the class specified by the with field.

ConfigurationConverter instances implement a single configFrom method, which will receive, as expected, the annotation instance annotating the dependent resource instance to be configured, but it can also extract information from the DependentResourceSpec instance associated with the DependentResource class so that metadata from it can be used in the configuration, as well as the parent ControllerConfiguration, if needed. The role of ConfigurationConverter implementations is to extract the annotation information, augment it with metadata from the DependentResourceSpec and the configuration from the parent controller on which the dependent is defined, to finally create the configuration object that the DependentResource instances will use.

However, one last element is required to finish the configuration process: the target DependentResource class must implement the ConfiguredDependentResource interface, parameterized with the annotation class defined by the @Configured annotation by field. This interface is called by the framework to inject the configuration at the appropriate time and retrieve the configuration, if it’s available.

For example, KubernetesDependentResource, a core implementation that the framework provides, can be configured via the @KubernetesDependent annotation. This set up is configured as follows:


@Configured(
        by = KubernetesDependent.class,
        with = KubernetesDependentResourceConfig.class,
        converter = KubernetesDependentConverter.class)
public abstract class KubernetesDependentResource<R extends HasMetadata, P extends HasMetadata>
        extends AbstractEventSourceHolderDependentResource<R, P, InformerEventSource<R, P>>
        implements ConfiguredDependentResource<KubernetesDependentResourceConfig<R>> {
  // code omitted
}

The @Configured annotation specifies that KubernetesDependentResource instances can be configured by using the @KubernetesDependent annotation, which gets converted into a KubernetesDependentResourceConfig object by a KubernetesDependentConverter. That configuration object is then injected by the framework in the KubernetesDependentResource instance, after it’s been created, because the class implements the ConfiguredDependentResource interface, properly parameterized.

For more information on how to use this feature, we recommend looking at how this mechanism is implemented for KubernetesDependentResource in the core framework, SchemaDependentResource in the samples or CustomAnnotationDep in the BaseConfigurationServiceTest test class.

EventSource-level configuration

TODO