Re: Query performance question on a large table - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Együd Csaba
Subject Re: Query performance question on a large table
Date
Msg-id 001a01c3d4f1$e4317840$230a0a0a@compaq
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Query performance question on a large table  (Tom Lane <[email protected]>)
List pgsql-general
Hi Tom,
thank you, I'll upgrade as soon as I can. Anyway I've already planned to do
so for a while.
I'll keep in mind your remarks concerning the DISTINCT clause too.

Bye and Best Regards,
-- Csaba

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Tom Lane
> Sent: 2004. január 6. 21:04
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected] (E-mail)
> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Query performance question on a large table
>
>
> =?iso-8859-2?Q?Egy=FCd_Csaba?= <[email protected]> writes:
> > here is a sample query:
> > select  mertido, fomeazon, ertektipus, mertertek from
> t_me30 where fomeazon
> > in (select distinct fomeazon from t_fome where lower(inuse)
> = 'igen') and
> > mertido like '2003-12-17%' and ertektipus in ('+MW') order
> by mertido,
> > fomeazon, ertektipus;
>
> > Ohh, I nearly forgot the config:  Linux 7.1; Postgres 7.3.2;
>
> The first thing you ought to do is move to PG 7.4.  "foo IN
> (SELECT ...)"
> generally works a lot better under 7.4 than prior releases.
> I'd suggest
> dropping the "DISTINCT" when using 7.4, too.
>
>             regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of
> broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to
> [email protected]
>
>
>
> -- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus (http://www.grisoft.com).
> Version: 7.0.209 / Virus Database: 261 - Release Date: 2004. 01. 02.
>


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Query performance question on a large table
Next
From: "John Sidney-Woollett"
Date:
Subject: Reparse PL/pgSQL Function?