Re: [PATCHES] Patch(es) to expose n_live_tuples and - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: [PATCHES] Patch(es) to expose n_live_tuples and
Date
Msg-id [email protected]
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCHES] Patch(es) to expose n_live_tuples and  (Robert Treat <[email protected]>)
Responses Re: [PATCHES] Patch(es) to expose n_live_tuples and
List pgsql-hackers
> The current terminology of live and dead is already used in many places in the
> documentation and in userspace; mostly around the need for maintainance of
> dead tuples within tables, reindex cleaning up dead pages, and even in the
> vacuum commands output (n dead tuples cannot be removed yet). Given this
> patch came from userland, istm people are comfortable enough with this
> terminology there is no need to change it.

+1

>
--

      === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive  PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
             http://www.commandprompt.com/

Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Treat
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Patch(es) to expose n_live_tuples and
Next
From: Benny Amorsen
Date:
Subject: Re: effective_cache_size vs units