> Gavin Sherry <[email protected]> writes:
> > I haven't had time to look into it further, but it occurs to me that
> > handling views which rely on joins would be far from trivial.
>
> Views containing joins would not be updatable; problem solved.
I see how that is what the spec says, but aren't the majority of joins that
people use/want to update a join of some type? I thought that SQL99 allowed
updating view created by joins.
In either case is this a place where "exceeding" the spec would be a good
thing or a bad thing?
Eric
