On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 00:56:11 +0200, Peter Eisentraut <[email protected]> wrote:
> Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> > > XHTML is simply a minimal reformulation of HTML in XML, and even
> > > uses the HTML 4.01 definitions for its semantics. Given that, it's
> > > hard to see why it should be considered a bad thing.
> >
> > Here is the article:
> > http://www.hixie.ch/advocacy/xhtml
>
> While I believe that the reasoning in the article is totally bogus, the
> article only talks about which MIME type should be used for XHTML, not
> about whether the format should be used. Note that if you support the
> conclusion of the article, you may find the entire PostgreSQL web site
> objectionable.
Then you have made an informed decision.
