Hi again,
Martin Pitt [2006-02-19 14:39 +0100]:
> Since this changes the behaviour of pg_restore, this should probably
> become an option, e. g. -D / --ignore-existing-table-data. I'll do
> this if you agree to the principle of the current patch.
I improved the patch now to only ignore TABLE DATA for existing tables
if '-X ignore-existing-tables' is specified. I also updated the
documentation.
Since this doesn't change the default behaviour now any more, I would
like to put this patch into the Debian packages to provide automatic
upgrades for PostGIS-enabled databases (see [1]). Does anyone object
to this?
Do you consider to adopt this upstream?
Thanks in advance, and have a nice weekend!
Martin
[1] http://bugs.debian.org/351571
--
Martin Pitt http://www.piware.de
Ubuntu Developer http://www.ubuntu.com
Debian Developer http://www.debian.org
In a world without walls and fences, who needs Windows and Gates?
