Re: blatantly a bug in the documentation - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Treat
Subject Re: blatantly a bug in the documentation
Date
Msg-id [email protected]
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: blatantly a bug in the documentation  ("Dave Page" <[email protected]>)
Responses Re: blatantly a bug in the documentation
List pgsql-hackers
On Monday 24 November 2008 09:10:29 Dave Page wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 2:01 PM, Magnus Hagander <[email protected]> 
wrote:
> > Dave Page wrote:
> >> That would defeat the point. Not that I have any great feelings either
> >> way, but fwiw, Microsoft and Oracle both create a sample database
> >> iirc.
> >
> > Last I checked, MS did it optionally only, no?
>
> Yes, but it defaults on iirc. We can emulate that behaviour in an
> installer (and do in Postgres Plus for example), but that doesn't help
> users of other distributions.
>

We actually have such a database on pgfoundry already 
(http://pgfoundry.org/frs/download.php/1719/pagila-0.10.1.zip), which i think 
devrim may have packaged into an rpm; it wouldn't hurt to add it to the win32 
installer, but would you feel better if it were a contrib module or 
something? 

-- 
Robert Treat
Conjecture: http://www.xzilla.net
Consulting: http://www.omniti.com


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: WIP: default values for function parameters
Next
From: ITAGAKI Takahiro
Date:
Subject: Comments to Synchronous replication patch v3