On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 03:01:05PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Josh Berkus <[email protected]> writes:
> > Tom,
> >> Like what? I do not actually believe that anyone needs an
> >> interactive geographical timezone selector based on
> >> pg_timezone_names.
>
> > Actually, considering that PostgreSQL is the leading open source
> > GIS database, I expect that a *lot* of people want this.
>
> Surely we'd have seen more complaints, then.
You're setting a pretty high bar here for a pretty small change which
will cause a pretty large increase in convenience. What is the actual
problem here?
Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <[email protected]> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: [email protected]
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
