David Rowley <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 19 January 2017 at 11:06, David Rowley <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Old patch no longer applies, so I've attached a rebased patch. This
> > also re-adds a comment line which I mistakenly removed.
>
> (meanwhile Andres commits 69f4b9c)
>
> I should've waited a bit longer.
>
> Here's another that fixes the new conflicts.
I suspect that "inner" and "outer" relation / tuple are sometimes confused in
comments:
* analyzejoins.c:70
"searches for subsequent matching outer tuples."
* analyzejoins.c:972
/** innerrel_is_unique* Check for proofs which prove that 'innerrel' can, at most, match a* single tuple in
'outerrel'based on the join condition in* 'restrictlist'.*/
* relation.h:1831
bool inner_unique; /* inner side of join matches no more than one * outer side
tuple*/
--
Antonin Houska
Cybertec Schönig & Schönig GmbH
Gröhrmühlgasse 26
A-2700 Wiener Neustadt
Web: http://www.postgresql-support.de, http://www.cybertec.at
