Michael Paquier <[email protected]> writes: > I would rather keep the solution with client_min_messages, and the > tests in vacuum.sql to keep those checks for the grammar parsing. So > this basically brings us back to use the patch I proposed here: > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/[email protected] OK. regards, tom lane
pgsql-hackers by date:
Соглашаюсь с условиями обработки персональных данных