Re: 8.1 development cycle (was a couple of other threads - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

Marc G. Fournier wrote:

> On Fri, 21 Jan 2005, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> On a slightly different note in regards to the development
>> cycle. I am authoring a new book and it would be helpful
>> to know the approximate completion of the dev cycle.
>>
>> If the dev cycle is going to be really short, are we expecting
>> a more traditional 12-16 month 8.2?
>
>
> That seems to be the norm ... my feel for discussions so far is that
> 8.1's focus is going to be primarily replacing ARC, and anything else
> that might slip in ...

So are we looking at a 8.1 in June and a 8.2 in say August of 2006?

Or something else?

I know that it is hard to completely pin these things down but it would
be really
helpful :)

J



>
> ----
> Marc G. Fournier           Hub.Org Networking Services
> (http://www.hub.org)
> Email: [email protected]           Yahoo!: yscrappy              ICQ:
> 7615664
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if
> your
>      joining column's datatypes do not match



--
Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC
Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting.
+1-503-667-4564 - [email protected] - http://www.commandprompt.com
PostgreSQL Replicator -- production quality replication for PostgreSQL


Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Extending System Views: proposal for 8.1/8.2
Next
From: "Marc G. Fournier"
Date:
Subject: Re: 8.1 development cycle (was a couple of other threads