Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> writes:
>
>>Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>>
>>>The correct lingo would be standard_conforming_strings. I'm going to change
>>>that.
>
>
>>Sounds good.
>
>
> No problem here either.
>
So does that mean for 8.1 it will be:
standard_conforming_strings = on/off
?
>
>>Another question is whether this should be backpatched to
>>our next 7.4.X or 8.0.X release as read-only variables.
>
>
> Unnecessary; any client code written to use this need only assume that
> absence of the parameter means the old behavior.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
