Tom Lane wrote:
> Thomas Hallgren <[email protected]> writes:
>
>> Why to you persist talking about licensing issues with PL/Java? There are none. PL/Java
>> builds and runs just fine with gcj and the above statement is completely false.
>>
>
> Um ... if you use it with gcj, there may or may not be any licensing
> problems (please recall we are trying to be a BSD-only project, not a
> BSD-and-LGPL project),
You have no problems using gcc, gnu-make, etc. What's the difference?
> but what of people who use some other JVM?
> It's not like gcj works for everyone yet.
>
>
What of them? If they decide to use another JVM, well, then let them. I
don't see where that becomes a licensing problem from PostgreSQL.
Regards,
Thomas Hallgren
