Christopher Browne wrote: > On Feb 7, 2008 9:42 PM, Alvaro Herrera <[email protected]> wrote: >> Gregory Stark escribió: >> >>> For what it's worth I think GIT is a better fit for our needs. >> Perhaps it would be, if it worked on Windows ... Not that I care, but I >> bet Magnus would. > > http://code.google.com/p/msysgit/ > > "Unfortunately, Git on Windows is only officially supported using > Cygwin. However, there is a fork (currently in the process of being > merged with "official" git) which enables you to compile git using > MinGW/MSys. > Mercurial, which is similar to GIT, offer native windows client. See there http://www.selenic.com/mercurial/wiki/index.cgi/BinaryPackages#head-adac70dc1664bb9eac334d5c8b57483d300254f3 It support binaries for most of PG supported platforms. I also recommend to see following page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_revision_control_software It compares a lot of SCMs. Zdenek
pgsql-hackers by date:
Соглашаюсь с условиями обработки персональных данных
