Request a Demo
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: "could not open relation 1663/16384/16584: No suchfile or directory" in a specific combination of transactions withtemp tables - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Heikki Linnakangas
Subject Re: "could not open relation 1663/16384/16584: No suchfile or directory" in a specific combination of transactions withtemp tables
Date
Msg-id [email protected]
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: "could not open relation 1663/16384/16584: No such file or directory" in a specific combination of transactions with temp tables  (Alvaro Herrera <[email protected]>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Heikki Linnakangas escribió:
> 
>> In the future, it would be nice to relax the restriction on using temp  
>> rels, though. A flag doesn't lend itself to that easily, but I'm sure  
>> we'll figure out something if we ever get around to implement that.
> 
> I can't recall the rationale for this limitation.  Do we need anything
> beyond flushing the table's buffers to disk?  That sounds an easy thing
> to implement.

See http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2005-05/msg01223.php

--   Heikki Linnakangas  EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: "could not open relation 1663/16384/16584: No such file or directory" in a specific combination of transactions with temp tables
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Patch application emails