Tom Lane wrote:
> Jeff Davis <[email protected]> writes:
>> [ hacky special-case representation for discrete timestamp ranges ]
>
> I'm still not exactly clear on what the use-case is for discrete
> timestamp ranges, and I wonder how many people are going to be happy
> with a representation that can't handle a range that's open-ended
> on the left.
They wouldn't. But the timestamp data would be the anchor, not
necessarily the start point. As long as we ranges unbounded on both ends
we'd be ok.
