Re: CommitFest 2010-11: Call for Reviewers - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Greg Smith
Subject Re: CommitFest 2010-11: Call for Reviewers
Date
Msg-id [email protected]
Whole thread Raw
In response to CommitFest 2010-11: Call for Reviewers  (Greg Smith <[email protected]>)
List pgsql-hackers
Despite some jerk submitting three brand new patches at the last minute
by himself, the November CommitFest is now closed for new submissions
and ready for review!  Only 7 of the 40 patches that need review have a
reviewer assigned so far.  Reviewers, mark down a patch you want to look
at in the CommitFest app:
https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/commitfest_view?id=8 or ask to
be assigned one on the pgsql-rrreviewers list, if you want to work on
something but don't have a preference for which patch.  There are a few
larger patches in this round, but the majority of those already have a
reviewer attached to them.  Many of the remaining patches are pretty
approachable even if you're relatively new to reviewing PostgreSQL
code.  See the usual for details:

http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Reviewing_a_Patch
http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/RRReviewers

--
Greg Smith   2ndQuadrant US    [email protected]   Baltimore, MD
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support        www.2ndQuadrant.us



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_stat_bgwriter broken?
Next
From: Greg Smith
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert default wal_sync_method to fdatasync on Linux 2.6.33+