Re: better atomics - v0.2 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: better atomics - v0.2
Date
Msg-id [email protected]
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: better atomics - v0.2  (Tom Lane <[email protected]>)
Responses Re: better atomics - v0.2
List pgsql-hackers
On 11/19/13, 9:57 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Hm.  Now that I think about it, isn't Peter proposing to break systems
> without working "inline" over here?
> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/[email protected]

No, that's about const, volatile, #, and memcmp.

I don't have an informed opinion about requiring inline support
(although it would surely be nice).




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Proof of concept: standalone backend with full FE/BE protocol
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: better atomics - v0.2