> You could well be right, but it would be good to compare the numbers just so we
> know this for sure.
I wasn't right :(
# set work_mem='64kB';
# set enable_seqscan = off;
Patched: 1194.094 ms
Master: 1765.338 ms
> Are you seeing the same?
Fixed too, the mistake was in supposition that current page becomes lossy in
tbm_lossify. It's not always true because tbm_lossify() could lossify only part
of pages and we don't know which. Thank you very much.
--
Teodor Sigaev E-mail: [email protected]
WWW: http://www.sigaev.ru/
