On 28/01/15 08:15, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>
>
> 2015-01-28 0:01 GMT+01:00 Jim Nasby <[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>>:
>
> On 1/27/15 4:36 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>
>
> It is only partially identical - I would to use cache for
> array_offset, but it is not necessary for array_offsets ..
> depends how we would to modify current API to support externally
> cached data.
>
>
> Externally cached data?
>
>
> Some from these functions has own caches for minimize access to typcache
> (array_map, array_cmp is example). And in first case, I am trying to
> push these information from fn_extra, in second case I don't do it,
> because I don't expect a repeated call (and I am expecting so type cache
> will be enough).
>
You actually do caching via fn_extra in both case and I think that's the
correct way, and yes that part can be moved common function.
I also see that the documentation does not say what is returned by
array_offset if nothing is found (it's documented in code but not in sgml).
-- Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training &
Services
