On 04/08/2016 02:42 PM, Robert Haas wrote: > On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 7:43 AM, Stas Kelvich <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Thanks for reviews and commit! > > I apologize for being clueless here, but was this patch committed? > It's still marked as "Needs Review" in the CommitFest application. > There are 2 parts to this - both in the same email thread. Part 1 [0] dealt with 2-phase commits on the master node. Part 2 [1] deals with replaying on slaves, which currently shows lag. There is still an open item found by Michael, so part 2 isn't ready to be moved to "Ready for Committer" yet. [0] http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commitdiff;h=978b2f65aa1262eb4ecbf8b3785cb1b9cf4db78e [1] https://commitfest.postgresql.org/9/523/ Best regards, Jesper
pgsql-hackers by date:
Соглашаюсь с условиями обработки персональных данных
