> On 26 Sep 2017, at 12:06, Masahiko Sawada <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Based on the review comment from Robert, I'm planning to do the big
> change to the architecture of this patch so that a backend process
> work together with a dedicated background worker that is responsible
> for resolving the foreign transactions.
For what it worth, I rebased latest patch to current master.
As far as I understand it is planned to change resolver arch,
so is it okay to review code that is intended for non-faulty
work scenarios?
Stas Kelvich
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
