Re: Two-phase commit - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From richard excite
Subject Re: Two-phase commit
Date
Msg-id [email protected]
Whole thread Raw
In response to Two-phase commit  ([email protected])
List pgsql-hackers
i'm developing one. a library for batch transactions, so you
can continue processing in the middle of the file(or table) in
case an abort happens. it can support multi-databases.
i think i can share it to freshmeat.

On Tue, 24 Oct 2000 13:52:38 +0200, [email protected] wrote:

>  Hello,
>  anyone thought about implementing two-phase commit to
>  be able to support distributed transactions ?
>  I have no clue how complex it would be, someone knows ?
>  
>  devik
>  
>





_______________________________________________________
Say Bye to Slow Internet!
http://www.home.com/xinbox/signup.html



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Fallback behavior for "UNKNOWN" types -- proposed change
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] binary operators on integers