Re: PostgreSQL 8.4 development plan - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

2008/2/8, Heikki Linnakangas <<a href="mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a>>:<br />>
GregoryStark wrote:<br />> > git or its ilk would impact the lives of submitters and reviewers most.<br /> >
>Basically it would allow two non-committers to collaborate, something which we<br />> > can't really do
effectivelynow.<br />> <br />> Two git-using non-committers can do that already, regardless of the<br /> >
masterrepository.<br /><br /><br />Maybe the existing SVN, git and other mirrors could just become more official and
supportedin the sense that users can rely on them to be updated often enough? At the moment what is there are some
linkson <a
href="http://developer.postgresql.org/index.php/Working_with_CVS#Other_versions_of_the_PostgreSQL_Repository">http://developer.postgresql.org/index.php/Working_with_CVS#Other_versions_of_the_PostgreSQL_Repository</a>
andno indication of how reliable these repositories are. I suppos that a lot of reason for discussion would disappear
ifthese repositories were made official and supported.<br /><br />Markus<br />