Simon Riggs <[email protected]> writes:
> On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 7:54 PM, Robert Haas <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Revised patch attached. �I think it would be useful to assert this
>> both at process startup time and at process shutdown, since it would
>> really be much nicer to have the process that didn't clean up fail the
>> assertion, rather than the new one that innocently inherited its slot;
>> so the attached patch takes that approach.
> Something stronger than an assertion at shutdown? Run-time test?
There's currently no evidence to suggest this will ever fire at all,
especially not in non-development builds, so an assert seems enough
to me.
regards, tom lane
