Re: Report: removing the inconsistencies in our CVS->git conversion - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Report: removing the inconsistencies in our CVS->git conversion
Date
Msg-id [email protected]
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Report: removing the inconsistencies in our CVS->git conversion  (Alvaro Herrera <[email protected]>)
List pgsql-hackers
Alvaro Herrera <[email protected]> writes:
> I think there's hardly much of interest in that branch, so it doesn't
> make sense to waste too much effort on it.  However, why would we delete
> it?  Just keep it with the manufactured tag and all -- so it is there,
> even if the history is not all that clean.  This _is_ an option, right?

That was pretty much my default position; I was just wondering if there
was a consensus to do something else.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Report: removing the inconsistencies in our CVS->git conversion
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: bg worker: patch 1 of 6 - permanent process