On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 4:57 PM, Merlin Moncure <[email protected]> wrote:
> PQinitSSL is *broken*. It's always been broken. Since it already
> takes a parameter, I say add a special switch...the backwards
> compatibility danger doesn't seem too bad.
Add a switch to what? I get very nervous for our Windows users when
people start talking about changing the libpq API (for those that
don't know, Windows doesn't have DLL versioning like Unix - so any
non-backwards compatible API change really needs a corresponding
filename change to avoid pain and suffering).
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
