Re: Extensions User Design - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dave Page
Subject Re: Extensions User Design
Date
Msg-id [email protected]
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Extensions User Design  (Dimitri Fontaine <[email protected]>)
Responses Re: Extensions User Design
Re: Extensions User Design
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 9:58 AM, Dimitri Fontaine<[email protected]> wrote:
> Dave Page <[email protected]> writes:
>> PGXS is essentially useless on Windows unless you're compiling your
>> own code using Mingw/msys, which will be a miniscule percentage of
>> users. Our installers for 8.3 and above are all built using VC++.
>
> I guess we'll have to see how the windows world installers are
> comparable / compatible with PGXS here, I confess I know nothing about
> them...
>
> Is it possible to design this part of the extension system with only
> PGXS in mind and later adapt the windows toolsuite?

Anything is possible :-). Better to ask someone with more perl
expertise than me how much effort it might take to have the VC++ build
system be able to create a project from an arbitrary PGXS makefile.
Andrew or Magnus would seem the obvious people.


-- 
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK:   http://www.enterprisedb.com


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Dimitri Fontaine
Date:
Subject: Re: Extensions User Design
Next
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: that picksplit debug message again