On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 9:48 PM, Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> wrote: > > Add to pl/pgsql TODO: > > o Consider invalidating the cache or keeping seperate cached > copies when search_path changes > > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2008-01/msg01009.php IMO, Tom's idea, namely to keep separate cache plans for various search_path settings, is a much stronger proposal and should probably get the 'todo'. merlin
pgsql-hackers by date:
Соглашаюсь с условиями обработки персональных данных