On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 3:18 PM, Fujii Masao <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 11:11 PM, Magnus Hagander <[email protected]> wrote:
>> More to the point, I'm not sure I like the creation of yet another DLL
>> to deal with this. The reason this isn't just exported from the main
>> backend is the same reason we created the libpqwalreceiver library I'm
>> sure - bt that means we already have one.
>>
>> How about we just use this same source file, but compile and link it
>> directly into both dblink and libpqwalreceiver? That'd leave us with
>> one DLL less, making life easier.
>
> ISTM that we cannot compile dblink using USE_PGXS=1, if that DLL doesn't
> exist in the installation directory. No?
I might have misinterpreted your point. You mean that the same source
file defining something like pgwin32_PQexec should be placed in both
contrib/dblink and src/backend/replication/libpqwalreceiver? If so,
we can compile dblink using USE_PGXS without the DLL.
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center
