Julian Rendell wrote:
> Hi there-
> hope you developers don't mind a (potential) end-users question:
> just discovered gitstat, and am really interested in the diff
> viewing/reporting feature.
Hi Julian,
I think this is the first ever email I saw coming from a non developer. (Judging
by the number of downloads gitstat is gaining popularity). I don't mind to have
the occasional end user question just to keep us aware that people are actually
using it (and care).
>
> I do QA on code releases, and am looking for a tool that will highlight
> what's changed at a directory/file level, and then let me see the
> individual changes. GitStat is the first tool I've found that shows
> differences at the file hierarchy level. I'm thinking I could create a
> git repo, and check in each release, so that I can use gitstat. There
> are likely to be large changes between checkins.
>
> Everything looks good until (using
> http://mirror.celinuxforum.org/gitstat/diff-index.php as a reference) I
> choose two points that would have a big delta- e.g. two releases of the
> linux kernel (e.g. v2.6.27 to v2.6.26)- then I get nothing.
I just checked on mirror.celinuxform.org and see your problem. Could you, in the
meanwhile, open a bug report for this ?
(http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=202992&atid=983802)
>
> If I try to compare to rc's, it looks pretty good.
> Arg, think I just found a bug- if a directory has a single file change,
> you get the diff but not the filename itself. If a directory has
> multiple files with changes, you get the filenames, which you can then
> click on to see the diff.
I will check this on my own system and see where the potential problem is. Do
you use the CVS version of gitstat or a regular release?
>
> Are these bugs?
>
> Is this an abuse of gitstat? :-) If so, can anyone suggest an alternate
> tool?
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Julian
>
>
Cheers,
Paul.
|