|
From: Ondrej C. <on...@ce...> - 2009-07-17 05:27:58
|
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 11:11 PM, Ondrej Certik<on...@ce...> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 4:42 PM, Robert Kern<rk...@en...> wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 17:26, Brian Granger<ell...@gm...> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I am attaching a working ctypes based prototype of a module that allows wx >>> to be used interactively from *both* python and ipython. It uses >>> PyOS_InputHook and has been tested on wx 2.8 and 2.9 (trunk) on Mac OS X >>> (python 2.5). >>> >>> It can be used with an existing wx install and all versions of ipython, but >>> ***don't use the -pylab or -wthread flag***. At this point, I need help >>> testing the heck out of this (window and linux users esp). I have run most >>> matplotlib pylab_examples and they work fine. I also need people to try out >>> things like ETS/Mayavi. The current plan is to replace the existing >>> threaded shells in IPython with this (much simpler) code. >> >> Works for me with wx 2.8.8.1 on OS X 10.5 and Chaco. Pan and zoom >> interactions are substantially chunky, though. I do not see such >> chunkiness with -wthread. It would be worth exploring a Cython >> alternative to see if it is just ctypes and general Python overhead to >> blame. > > Works for me on Ubuntu 9.04 with default packages (wx 2.8.9.1), I > tried this example: > > In [1]: import inputhook > > In [2]: inputhook.set_inputhook_wx() > > In [3]: app = wx.App(redirect=False, clearSigInt=False) > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > NameError Traceback (most recent call last) > > /home/ondrej/Desktop/<ipython console> in <module>() > > NameError: name 'wx' is not defined > > In [4]: import wx > > In [5]: app = wx.App(redirect=False, clearSigInt=False) > > In [6]: from matplotlib import pyplot as plt > > In [7]: plt.interactive(True) > > In [8]: plt.plot(range(10)) > Out[8]: [<matplotlib.lines.Line2D object at 0x3917090>] > > > (maybe you want to add "import wx" into that example docstring) > > > Pan is perfectly smooth, zoom is a bit chunky, but not much, it's > definitely usable. I also tested mayavi, this demo: http://code.enthought.com/projects/mayavi/docs/development/html/mayavi/mlab.html#a-demo and I didn't notice any speed difference --- e.g. it's as slow as regular mayavi with ipython -wthread. :) Ondrej |