You can subscribe to this list here.
2010 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(10) |
May
(17) |
Jun
(3) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(8) |
Oct
(18) |
Nov
(51) |
Dec
(74) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2011 |
Jan
(47) |
Feb
(44) |
Mar
(44) |
Apr
(102) |
May
(35) |
Jun
(25) |
Jul
(56) |
Aug
(69) |
Sep
(32) |
Oct
(37) |
Nov
(31) |
Dec
(16) |
2012 |
Jan
(34) |
Feb
(127) |
Mar
(218) |
Apr
(252) |
May
(80) |
Jun
(137) |
Jul
(205) |
Aug
(159) |
Sep
(35) |
Oct
(50) |
Nov
(82) |
Dec
(52) |
2013 |
Jan
(107) |
Feb
(159) |
Mar
(118) |
Apr
(163) |
May
(151) |
Jun
(89) |
Jul
(106) |
Aug
(177) |
Sep
(49) |
Oct
(63) |
Nov
(46) |
Dec
(7) |
2014 |
Jan
(65) |
Feb
(128) |
Mar
(40) |
Apr
(11) |
May
(4) |
Jun
(8) |
Jul
(16) |
Aug
(11) |
Sep
(4) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(5) |
Dec
(16) |
2015 |
Jan
(5) |
Feb
|
Mar
(2) |
Apr
(5) |
May
(4) |
Jun
(12) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(4) |
2019 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(2) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
1
(12) |
2
(4) |
3
|
4
(17) |
5
(2) |
6
(5) |
7
(5) |
8
(23) |
9
|
10
(1) |
11
|
12
(2) |
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
(3) |
19
(1) |
20
(3) |
21
(10) |
22
(2) |
23
|
24
(1) |
25
(4) |
26
(8) |
27
(5) |
28
|
29
(3) |
30
(6) |
31
(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
From: Abbas B. <abb...@en...> - 2013-03-29 12:33:09
|
Hi, Attached please find a revised patch that provides support in pg_dumpall to dump nodes and node groups if the command line option --dump-nodes is provided. I tested and found that pg_dumpall works as expected. On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 5:04 PM, Abbas Butt <abb...@en...>wrote: > Feature ID 3608376 > > On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 7:59 PM, Abbas Butt <abb...@en...>wrote: > >> Hi, >> Attached please find a patch that adds support in pg_dump to dump nodes >> and node groups. This is required while adding a new node to the cluster. >> >> -- >> Abbas >> Architect >> EnterpriseDB Corporation >> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company >> >> Phone: 92-334-5100153 >> >> Website: www.enterprisedb.com >> EnterpriseDB Blog: http://blogs.enterprisedb.com/ >> Follow us on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/enterprisedb >> >> This e-mail message (and any attachment) is intended for the use of >> the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. This message >> contains information from EnterpriseDB Corporation that may be >> privileged, confidential, or exempt from disclosure under applicable >> law. If you are not the intended recipient or authorized to receive >> this for the intended recipient, any use, dissemination, distribution, >> retention, archiving, or copying of this communication is strictly >> prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify >> the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this message. > > > > > -- > -- > Abbas > Architect > EnterpriseDB Corporation > The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company > > Phone: 92-334-5100153 > > Website: www.enterprisedb.com > EnterpriseDB Blog: http://blogs.enterprisedb.com/ > Follow us on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/enterprisedb > > This e-mail message (and any attachment) is intended for the use of > the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. This message > contains information from EnterpriseDB Corporation that may be > privileged, confidential, or exempt from disclosure under applicable > law. If you are not the intended recipient or authorized to receive > this for the intended recipient, any use, dissemination, distribution, > retention, archiving, or copying of this communication is strictly > prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify > the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this message. -- -- Abbas Architect EnterpriseDB Corporation The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company Phone: 92-334-5100153 Website: www.enterprisedb.com EnterpriseDB Blog: http://blogs.enterprisedb.com/ Follow us on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/enterprisedb This e-mail message (and any attachment) is intended for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. This message contains information from EnterpriseDB Corporation that may be privileged, confidential, or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient or authorized to receive this for the intended recipient, any use, dissemination, distribution, retention, archiving, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this message. |
From: Kaiji C. <ch...@im...> - 2013-03-29 10:35:49
|
Hi, I'm working on a data partitioning project on PostgreSQL by adding a middleware between the database cluster interface and applications that modify the SQL statement to specific data nodes. I just find that PostgresXC has a nice GTM that can help me do the distributed transaction management works, I considered to transfer my project on it. It seems the sliders (http://wiki.postgresql.org/images/f/f6/PGXC_Scalability_PGOpen2012.pdf) intend that user defined table distribution is not available, but the coordinator can choose specific data node when processing the queries, and the table will be distributed to by default if DISTRIBUTED BY is not specified. Then I wonder if I can specify a data node in each query and stop the default auto distributing process. |