Prepared
Witness Testimony The Committee on Energy and Commerce W.J. "Billy" Tauzin, Chairman Identity Theft: Assessing the Problem and Efforts to Combat It. Ms. Betsy Broder
1.
INTRODUCTION Mr.
Chairman, and members of the Subcommittee, I am Betsy Broder, Assistant
Director of the Division of Planning and Information, Bureau of Consumer
Protection, Federal Trade Commission ("FTC" or
"Commission").[1]
I appreciate the opportunity to present the Commission-s views on the impact of
identity theft on consumers. The
Federal Trade Commission has a broad mandate to protect consumers, and
controlling identity theft is an important issue of concern to all consumers.
The FTC-s role in combating identity theft derives from the 1998 Identity Theft
Assumption and Deterrence Act ("the Identity Theft Act" or "the
Act").[2] The Act directed the
Federal Trade Commission to establish the federal government-s central
repository for identity theft complaints, to make available and to refer these
complaints to law enforcement for their investigations, and to provide victim
assistance and consumer education. Thus, the FTC-s role under the Act is
primarily one of facilitating information sharing among public and private
entities.[3]
The Commission also works extensively with industry on ways to improve victim
assistance, including providing direct advice and assistance in cases of
security breaches involving sensitive information of customers or employees. 2.
THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION-S ROLE IN COMBATING IDENTITY THEFT The
Identity Theft Act strengthened the criminal laws governing identity theft[4]
and focused on consumers as victims.[5]
In so doing, Congress recognized that coordinated efforts are essential to best
serve the needs of identity theft victims because these fraud victims often
need assistance both from government agencies at the national and state or local
level and from businesses. To fulfill the Act-s mandate, the Commission
implemented a program that focuses on three principal components: (1)
collecting complaints and providing victim assistance through a telephone
hotline and a dedicated website; (2) maintaining and promoting the Identity
Theft Data Clearinghouse (the "Clearinghouse"), a centralized database
of victim complaints that serves as an investigative tool for law enforcement;
and (3) providing outreach and education to consumers, law enforcement, and
private industry on prevention of identity theft. A.
Understanding Identity Theft On
November 1, 1999, the Commission began collecting complaints from consumers via
a toll-free telephone number, 1-877-ID THEFT (438-4338) ("ID Theft hotline").
Every year since has seen an increase in complaints.[6]
The Clearinghouse now contains over 400,000 identity theft complaints from
victims across the country. By itself, though, this self-reported data
does not allow the FTC to draw conclusions about the incidence of identity theft
in the general population. Consequently, the FTC commissioned a survey to
get a better picture of the incidence of identity theft and the impact of the
crime on its victims.[7]
The results are startling. Identity theft is more widespread and
pernicious than previously realized. The data show that within the 12
months preceding the survey, 3.2 million people discovered that an identity
thief opened new accounts in their name. An additional 6.6 million
consumers learned of the misuse of an existing account. Overall, nearly 10
million people B or 4.6 percent of the adult population B discovered that they
were victims of some form of identity theft. These numbers translate to
nearly $48 billion in losses to businesses, nearly $5 billion in losses to
victims, and almost 300 million hours spent by victims trying to resolve the
problem. Moreover, according to the researchers, identity theft is a
growing crime. The survey indicates a significant increase in the past 2-3
years B nearly a doubling from one year to the next, although the research shows
that the rate of increase slowed during the past 1-2 years. It also is
worth noting that most of the recent increase primarily involves the account
takeover form of identity theft that tends to cause less economic injury to
victims and is generally easier for them to identify and fix. Overall, the
survey puts the problem of identity theft into sharper focus, and has spurred
the FTC to even greater efforts to help victims and support law enforcement in
its aggressive prosecution of identity thieves. B.
Assisting Identity Theft Victims In
addition to taking complaints from victims, the FTC provides advice on recovery
from identity theft. Callers to the ID Theft hotline receive telephone
counseling from specially trained personnel who provide general information
about identity theft and help guide victims through the steps needed to resolve
the problems resulting from the misuse of their identities.[8]
Victims are advised to: (1) obtain copies of their credit reports from the
three national consumer reporting agencies and have a fraud alert placed on
their credit reports;[9]
(2) contact each of the creditors or service providers where the identity thief
has established or accessed an account, to request that the account be closed
and to dispute any associated charges; and (3) report the identity theft to the
police and get a police report, which is very helpful in demonstrating to
would-be creditors and debt collectors that the consumers are genuine victims of
identity theft. Counselors
also advise victims having particular problems about their rights under relevant
consumer credit laws including the Fair Credit Reporting Act,[10]
the Fair Credit Billing Act,[11]
the Truth in Lending Act,[12]
and the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act.[13]
If the investigation and resolution of the identity theft falls under the
jurisdiction of another regulatory agency that has a program in place to assist
consumers, callers also are referred to those agencies. The
FTC-s identity theft website, located at www.consumer.gov/idtheft, provides
equivalent service for those who prefer the immediacy of an online interaction.
The site contains a secure complaint form that allows victims to enter
their identity theft information for input into the Clearinghouse. Victims
also can read and download all of the resources necessary for reclaiming their
credit record and good name. One resource in particular is the FTC-s
tremendously successful consumer education booklet, Identity Theft: When Bad
Things Happen to Your Good Name. The 26-page booklet, now in its fourth
edition, comprehensively covers a range of topics, including the first steps to
take for victims, how to correct credit-related and other problems that may
result from identity theft, tips for those having trouble getting a police
report taken, and advice on ways to protect personal information. It also
describes federal and state resources that are available to victims who may be
having particular problems as a result of the identity theft. The FTC
alone has distributed more than 1.2 million copies of the booklet since its
release in February 2000, and recorded over 1.2 million visits to the web
version.[14]
Last year, the FTC released a Spanish language version of the Identity Theft
booklet, Robo de Identidad: Algo malo puede pasarle a su buen nombre. C.
The Identity Theft Data Clearinghouse Because
one of the primary purposes of the Identity Theft Act was for criminal law
enforcement agencies to use the database of victim complaints to support their
investigations, the Commission took a number of steps to ensure that the
database would meet the needs of law enforcement, before launching it.
Initially, the FTC met with a host of law enforcement and regulatory agencies to
obtain feedback on what the database should contain. Law enforcement
access to the Clearinghouse via the FTC-s secure website became available in
July of 2000. To ensure that the database operates as a national
clearinghouse for complaints, the FTC has solicited complaints from other
sources. For example, in February 2001, the Social Security Administration
Office of Inspector General (SSA-OIG) began providing the FTC with complaints
from its fraud hotline, significantly enriching the FTC-s database. The
Clearinghouse provides a picture of the nature, prevalence, and trends of the
identity theft victims who submit complaints. FTC data analysts aggregate
the data and develop them into charts and statistics.[15]
For instance, the Commission publishes charts showing the prevalence of identity
theft by states and by cities. Law enforcement and policy makers at all
levels of government use these reports to better understand the challenges
identity theft presents. Since
the inception of the Clearinghouse, more than 770 law enforcement agencies, from
the federal to the local level, have signed up for access to the database.
Individual investigators within those agencies have the ability to access the
system from their desktop computers 24 hours a day, seven days a week. The
Commission actively encourages even greater participation. As
previously stated, one of the goals of the Clearinghouse and the FTC-s identity
theft program is to support identity theft prosecutions nationwide.[16] Last year, in an
effort to further expand the use of the Clearinghouse among law enforcement, the
FTC, in cooperation with the Department of Justice, the United States Postal
Inspection Service, and the United States Secret Service, initiated full-day
identity theft training seminars for state and local law enforcement officers.
To date, sessions have been held in Washington, D.C., Des Moines, Chicago, San
Francisco, Las Vegas, Dallas, Phoenix, New York, Seattle, and San Antonio.
The FTC also helped the Kansas and Missouri offices of the U.S. Attorney and
State Attorney General conduct a training seminar in Kansas City. More
than 1200 officers have attended these seminars, representing more than 300
different agencies. A session to be held in Orlando in January will
commence next year-s round of seminars. The
FTC staff also developed an identity theft case referral program.[17]
The staff creates preliminary investigative reports by examining significant
patterns of identity theft activity in the Clearinghouse and refining the data
through the use of additional investigative resources. Then the staff
refers the investigative reports to appropriate Financial Crimes Task Forces and
other law enforcers located throughout the country for further investigation and
potential prosecution. The FTC is aided in this work by its federal law
enforcement partners including the United States Secret Service, the Federal
Bureau of Investigation, and the United States Postal Inspection Service who
provide staff and other resources. D.
Outreach and Education The
Identity Theft Act also directed the FTC to provide information to consumers
about identity theft. Recognizing that law enforcement and private
industry each play an important role in the ability of consumers both to
minimize their risk and to recover from identity theft, the FTC expanded its
outreach and education mission to include these sectors. (1)
Consumers: The FTC has taken the lead in coordinating with other
government agencies and organizations in the development and dissemination of
comprehensive consumer education materials for victims of identity theft and
those concerned with preventing this crime. The FTC-s extensive consumer
and business education campaign includes print materials, media mailings, and
radio and television interviews. The FTC also maintains the identity theft
website, which includes the publications and links to testimony, reports, press
releases, identity theft-related state laws, and other resources. To
increase identity theft awareness for the average consumer, the FTC recently
developed a new primer on identity theft, ID Theft: What-s It All About?.
This publication discusses the common methods of identity thieves, how consumers
can best minimize their risk of being victimized, how to identify the signs of
victimization, and the basic first steps for victims. Since its release in
May 2003, the FTC has distributed almost 268,000 paper copies, and over 15,000
web versions. With the detailed victim recovery guide, Identity Theft:
When Bad Things Happen to Your Good Name, the publication helps to fully educate
consumers. (2)
Law Enforcement: Because law enforcement at the state and local level can
provide significant practical assistance to victims, the FTC places a premium on
outreach to such agencies. In addition to the training described
previously (see supra Section II.C.), the FTC staff joined with North Carolina-s
Attorney General Roy Cooper to send letters to every other Attorney General
letting him or her know about the FTC-s identity theft program and how each
Attorney General could use the resources of the program to better assist
residents of his or her state. The letter encouraged each Attorney General
to link to the consumer information and complaint form on the FTC-s website and
to let residents know about the hotline, stressed the importance of the
Clearinghouse as a central database, and described all of the educational
materials that each Attorney General can distribute to residents. North
Carolina took the lead in availing itself of the Commission-s resources in
putting together for its resident victims a package of assistance that includes
the ID Theft Affidavit (see Section II.D.(3)(b)), links to the FTC website and
www.consumer.gov/idtheft. Through this initiative, the FTC hopes to make
the most efficient use of federal resources by allowing states to take advantage
of the work the FTC already has accomplished and at the same time continuing to
expand the centralized database of victim complaints and increase its use by law
enforcement nationwide. Other outreach initiatives include: (i)
Participation in a "Roll Call" video produced by the Secret Service,
which has been sent to thousands of law enforcement departments across the
country to instruct officers on identity theft, investigative resources, and
assisting victims and (ii) the redesign of the FTC-s website to include a
section for law enforcement with tips on how to help victims as well as
resources for investigations. (3)
Industry: The private sector can help with the problem of identity theft
in a number of ways. For instance, businesses can prevent identity theft
by keeping their customers- or employees- sensitive information secure and out
of the wrong hands. In addition, businesses can implement procedures to
assist identity theft victims in the recovery process. (a)
Information Security Breaches: The FTC works with institutions that
maintain personal information to identify ways to help keep that information
safe from identity theft. Last year, the FTC invited representatives from
financial institutions, credit issuers, universities, and retailers to an
informal roundtable discussion of how to prevent unauthorized access to personal
information in employee and customer records. The FTC will soon publish a
self-assessment guide to make businesses and organizations of all sizes more
aware of how they manage personal information and to aid them in assessing their
security protocols. As
awareness of the FTC-s role in identity theft has grown, businesses and
organizations that have suffered compromises of personal information have begun
to contact the FTC for assistance. For example, in the cases of TriWest[18]
and Ford/Experian,[19]
in which tens of thousands of consumers- files were compromised, the Commission
gave advice on how to notify those individuals and how to protect the data in
the future. To provide better assistance in these types of cases, the FTC
developed a kit, Information Compromise and the Risk of Identity Theft: Guidance
for Your Business, that will be posted on the identity theft website in the
coming weeks. The kit provides advice on which law enforcement agency to
contact, business contact information for the three major credit reporting
agencies, suggestions for establishing an internal communication protocol,
information about contacting the FTC for assistance, and a detailed explanation
of what information individuals need to know. The kit also includes a
model letter for notifying individuals when their names and Social Security
numbers have been taken. Organizations are encouraged to print and include
copies of Identity Theft: When Bad Things Happen to Your Good Name with the
letter to individuals. The
FTC particularly stresses the importance of notifying individuals as soon as
possible when information has been taken that may put them at risk for identity
theft. They can then begin to take steps to limit the potential damage to
themselves. For example, individuals whose Social Security numbers have
been compromised, and who place a fraud alert promptly have a good chance of
preventing, or at least reducing, the likelihood that the theft or release of
this information will turn into actual misuse. Prompt notification also
alerts these individuals to review their credit reports and to watch for the
signs of identity theft. In the event that they should become victims,
they can quickly take action to clear their records before any long-term damage
is done. Besides providing Information Compromise and the Risk of Identity
Theft: Guidance for Your Business, the FTC staff can provide individual
assistance and advice, including review of consumer information materials for
the organization and coordination of searches of the Clearinghouse for
complaints with the law enforcement officer working the case. (b)
Victim Assistance: Identity theft victims spend significant time and
effort restoring their good name and financial records. As a result, the
FTC devotes significant resources to conducting outreach with the private sector
on ways to improve victim assistance procedures. One such initiative arose
from the burdensome requirement that victims complete a different fraud
affidavit for each different creditor with whom the identity thief had opened an
account.[20]
To reduce that burden, the FTC worked with industry and consumer advocates to
create a standard form for victims to use in resolving identity theft debts.
From its release in August 2001 through October 2003, the FTC has distributed
more than 293,000 print copies of the ID Theft Affidavit. There have also
been nearly 479,000 hits to the web version. The affidavit is available in
both English and Spanish. Another
initiative designed to assist victims is the "joint fraud alert"
administered by the three major credit reporting agencies ("CRAs").
After receiving a request from an identity theft victim for the placement of a
fraud alert on his or her consumer report and for a copy of that report, each
CRA now shares that request with the other two CRAs, thereby eliminating the
requirement that the victim contact each of the three major CRAs
separately. III.
New Protections for Identity Theft Victims On
December 4, President Bush signed the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act
of 2003.[21]
Many of the provisions amend the Fair Credit Reporting Act ("FCRA")[22] and provide new and
important measures to prevent identity theft, enhance consumer ability to detect
it when it does occur, and facilitate identity theft victims- recovery.[23] A.
Access to free
consumer reports[24]
Previously,
under the FCRA consumers were entitled to a free consumer report only under
limited circumstances.[25]
Now consumers have the right to request a free consumer report annually from
nationwide CRAs. This benefit will enhance consumers- ability to discover
and correct errors, thereby improving the accuracy of the system, and also can
provide an early alert to identity theft victims about crimes committed in their
names. B.
National fraud alert system[26] Under
this provision, consumers who reasonably suspect they have been or may be
victimized by identity theft, or who are military personnel on active duty away
from home, can place an alert on their credit files. The alert will put
potential creditors on notice that they must proceed with caution when granting
credit in the consumer-s name. The provision also codified and
standardized the industry-s "joint fraud alert" initiative (see
Section II.D.(3)(b) supra). C.
Identity theft account blocking[27] This
provision requires CRAs immediately to cease reporting, or block, allegedly
fraudulent account information on consumer reports when the consumer submits a
police report or similar document, unless there is reason to believe the report
is false. Blocking would mitigate the harm to consumers- credit records
that can result from identity theft. D.
Truncation of credit and debit card receipts[28] In
many instances, identity theft results from thieves obtaining access to account
numbers on credit card receipts. This source of fraud could be reduced by
requiring merchants to truncate the full card number on the receipt. The
use of truncation technology is becoming widespread, and some card issuers
already require merchants to truncate. This law now requires truncation of
credit and debit card numbers on electronic receipts, but creates a phase-in
period to allow for the replacement of existing equipment. E.
"Red flag" indicators of identity theft[29] Under
this provision, the banking regulators and the FTC will jointly develop
guidelines for "red flag" indicators of identity theft.
The goal of this provision is to give financial institutions and creditors
up-to-date information on identity theft patterns and practices so that they can
take appropriate action to prevent this crime. IV.
CONCLUSION Identity
theft places substantial costs on individuals and businesses. The
Commission, through its education and enforcement capabilities, is committed to
reducing identity theft as much as possible. The Commission will continue
its efforts to assist criminal law enforcement with their investigations.
Prosecuting perpetrators sends the message that identity theft is not cost-free.
Finally, the Commission knows that as with any crime, identity theft can never
be completely eradicated. Thus, the Commission-s program to assist victims
and work with the private sector on ways to facilitate the process for regaining
victims- good names will always remain a priority. [1]
The views expressed in this statement represent the views of the
Commission. My oral presentation and responses to questions are my own
and do not necessarily represent the views of the Commission or any
Commissioner. [2]
Pub. L. No. 105-318, 112 Stat. 3007 (1998) (codified at 18 U.S.C. ' 1028). [3]
Most identity theft cases are best addressed through criminal prosecution.
The FTC itself has no direct criminal law enforcement authority. Under
its civil law enforcement authority provided by Section 5 of the FTC Act, the
Commission may, in appropriate cases, bring actions to stop practices that
involve or facilitate identity theft. See, e.g., FTC v. Corporate
Marketing Solutions, Inc., CIV - 02 1256 PHX RCB (D. Ariz. Feb. 3, 2003)
(final order) (defendants "pretexted" personal information from
consumers and engaged in unauthorized billing of consumers- credit cards) and
FTC v. C.J., CIV - 03 5275 GHK (RZx) (C.D. Cal. July 24, 2003) (final order)
(defendant sent spam purporting to come from AOL and created an AOL look-alike
website in order to obtain credit card numbers and other financial data from
consumers which defendant used for unauthorized online purchases.). In
addition, the FTC brought six complaints against marketers for purporting to
sell international driver-s permits that could be used to facilitate identity
theft. Press Release, Federal Trade Commission, FTC Targets Sellers Who
Deceptively Marketed International Driver's Permits over the Internet and via
Spam (Jan. 16, 2003), available at http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2003/01/idpfinal.htm. [4]
18 U.S.C. ' 1028(a)(7). The statute broadly defines "means of
identification" to include "any name or number that may be used,
alone or in conjunction with any other information, to identify a specific
individual," including, among other things, name, address, social
security number, driver-s license number, biometric data, access devices
(i.e., credit cards), electronic identification number or routing code, and
telecommunication identifying information. [5]
Because individual consumers- financial liability is often limited, prior to
the passage of the Act, financial institutions, rather than individuals,
tended to be viewed as the primary victims of identity theft. Setting up
an assistance process for consumer victims is consistent with one of the Act-s
stated goals: to recognize the individual victims of identity theft.
See S. Rep. No. 105-274, at 4 (1998). [6]
Charts that summarize data from the Clearinghouse can be found at http://www.consumer.gov/idtheft/stats.html
and http://www.consumer.gov/sentinel/index.html. [7]
The research took place during March and April 2003. It was conducted by
Synovate, a private research firm, and involved a random sample telephone
survey of over 4,000 U.S. adults. The full report of the survey can be
found at http://www.consumer.gov/idtheft/stats.html. [8]
Spanish speaking counselors are available for callers who are not fluent in
English. [9]
These fraud alerts indicate that the consumer is to be contacted before new
credit is issued in that consumer-s name. See Section II.D.(3)(b) infra
for a discussion of the credit reporting agencies "joint fraud alert"
initiative. [10]
15 U.S.C. ' 1681 et seq. [11]
Id. ' 1666. The Fair Credit Billing Act generally applies to "open
end" credit accounts, such as credit cards, revolving charge accounts,
and overdraft checking accounts. It does not cover installment
contracts, such as loans or extensions of credit that are repaid on a fixed
schedule. [12]
Id. ' 1601 et seq. [13]
Id. ' 1692 et seq. [14]
Other government agencies, including the Social Security Administration, the
SEC, and the FDIC also have printed and distributed copies of Identity Theft:
When Bad Things Happen to Your Good Name. [15]
Charts that summarize data from the Clearinghouse can be found at http://www.consumer.gov/idtheft/stats.html
and http://www.consumer.gov/sentinel/index.html. [16]
The Commission testified last year in support of S. 2541, the Identity Theft
Penalty Enhancement Act of 2002, which would increase penalties and streamline
proof requirements for prosecution of many of the most harmful forms of
identity theft. See Testimony of Bureau Director J. Howard Beales,
Senate Judiciary Committee, Subcommittee on Terrorism, Technology and
Government Information (July 11, 2002). S. 2541 has been reintroduced in
the 108th Congress as S. 153. [17]
The referral program complements the regular use of the database by all law
enforcers from their desktop computers. [18]
Adam Clymer, Officials Say Troops Risk Identity Theft After Burglary, N.Y.
Times, Jan. 12, 2003, ' 1 (Late Edition), at 12. [19]
Kathy M. Kristof and John J. Goldman, 3 Charged in Identity Theft Case, LA
Times, Nov. 6, 2002, Main News, Part 1 (Home Edition), at 1. [20]
See ID Theft: When Bad Things Happen to Your Good Name: Hearing Before the
Subcomm. on Technology, Terrorism and Government Information of the Senate
Judiciary Comm. 106th Cong. (2000) (statement of Mrs. Maureen Mitchell,
Identity Theft Victim). [21]
Pub. L. No. 108-396 (2003) (codified at 15 U.S.C. ' 1681 et seq.). [22]
15 U.S.C. ' 1681 et seq. [23]
The Commission testified on July 9 and 10, 2003 before the House Committee on
Financial Services and the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban
Affairs respectively. The testimony can be found at http://www.ftc.gov/os/2003/07/fcratest.html
and http://www.ftc.gov/os/2003/07/fcrasenatetest.htm. [24]
Pub. L. No. 108-396, ' 211 (2003). [25]
Previously, free reports were available only pursuant to the FCRA when the
consumer suffered adverse action, believed that fraudulent information may be
in his or her credit file, was unemployed, or was receiving welfare benefits.
Absent one of these exceptions, consumers had to pay a statutory "reasonable
charge" for a file disclosure; this fee is set each year by the
Commission and is currently $9. See 15 U.S.C. ' 1681j. In addition, a
small number of states required the CRAs to provide free annual reports to
consumers at their request. [26]
Pub. L. No. 108-396, ' 112 (2003). [27]
Id. ' 152. [28]
Id. ' 113. [29]
Id. ' 114. The
Committee on Energy and Commerce |
NEWSLETTER
|
Join the GlobalSecurity.org mailing list |
|
|