Postman vs Rest Assured: API Testing Tools Compared

View profile for SUKESH KUMAR S

Software Testing|Selenium-JAVA|Automation Testing|Mobile Testing|API Testing

🚀 Postman vs Rest Assured: Which one to choose for API Automation? When I work on API testing, one common question I come across is: 👉 Should we use Postman (with Newman) or go for a code-based framework like Rest Assured? Here’s a simple comparison from my QA experience: 🔹 Postman + Newman Beginner-friendly, no heavy coding needed Quick setup for small to mid-size test suites Great collaboration through collections and environments Best for QA-heavy teams needing faster validation 🔹 Rest Assured (Java-based) Requires coding knowledge (Java, TestNG/JUnit) Powerful for large-scale, complex frameworks Full flexibility with assertions, DB checks, and CI/CD Best for Dev/QA hybrid teams who want scalability 💡 Example: Testing GET https://lnkd.in/gQPsUNrH In Postman, just write assertions in the Tests tab. In Rest Assured, write Java test cases with JUnit/TestNG for CI/CD integration. ⚖️ My takeaway: If the goal is speed and ease, go with Postman. If the goal is scalability and integration with dev pipelines, choose Rest Assured. At the end, both tools have their own strengths — the choice depends on your team’s skillset and project needs. #APITesting #QAAutomation #Postman #RestAssured #TestAutomation #SoftwareTesting

  • diagram

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore content categories