Corporate Social Responsibility

In 2010, fewer than 100,000 battery electric vehicles were sold worldwide. In 2025, that number was 12.7 million. The Nissan Leaf launched in 2010 as the world's first mass-market electric car. The Tesla Model S followed two years later. For most of the decade, the market barely moved. The technology existed. The buyers didn't come. Then something changed. From 2020, the curve went near-vertical. Falling battery costs, a flood of new models, and policy pressure in China and Europe together triggered one of the fastest technology transitions in automotive history. 1 in 6 new cars sold globally last year was battery electric. In China, it was 1 in 2. We are still in the early stages. But the direction of travel is no longer in doubt.

People sometimes see Acumen raising large amounts of commercial capital and assume we no longer need philanthropy. No sooner had we announced $250M for our Hardest-to-Reach fund — to bring off-grid light and electricity to 70 million people across 17 of Africa’s most challenging markets — than some concluded Acumen must be set. In fact, the opposite is true. First, let me acknowledge how tough this fundraising environment is. I couldn’t be prouder of the team and partners who made our Hardest-to-Reach announcement possible after 2.5 years of relentless effort. And yet it’s worth underscoring: none of this would have been possible without philanthropy. Philanthropy is the first mover. It allows us to place early bets in fragile markets like Malawi and Benin, cover the development costs needed to structure and raise investment across the capital spectrum and provide the technical assistance that builds capacity. To put a finer point on it: of the nearly $250M raised for Hardest-to-Reach, more than $80M is philanthropic. That risk-taking anchor made it possible to prove new models — and ultimately unlock institutional investment. During Climate Week last month, I met philanthropists who see this as the time to pivot from grantmaking toward impact investing. While I understand the instinct, I want to offer a reframing: it’s not either/or. If you want your capital to have lasting impact, there may be no better use than catalytic philanthropy — especially when deployed through blended finance models like Hardest-to-Reach. Philanthropy cannot see itself at the margins. It is catalytic capital — risk-taking, patient, and unabashedly impact-first — creating the conditions for commercial capital to follow. And it's more important now than ever as traditional aid shrinks and many governments shift from grants to investment approaches. At Acumen, philanthropy from donors at all levels remains our bedrock. It enables us to reach the hardest-to-reach, build inclusive markets where none exist, and keep social impact at the center of everything we do. And because solving problems of poverty is Acumen’s mission, raising philanthropic capital will remain essential to our work.

Greenwash like a pro, part 2: (after my first post went viral) Lesson # 2: "The airport on a path to CO2 free, net zero future." 5 reasons why this ad is misleading: 1. "Net zero by 2035" ↳ covers only buildings, cars, or electricity ↳ not 99% of their footprint: the flights ↳it's like a coal plant saying it's green, because the office runs on solar 2. "Munich airport will reduce ... " ↳ “will” = future promise, not action ↳ I could say: "I will become a # 1 heavy-lifter by 2035.” ↳ it sounds cool. it doesn't make it real 3. "... it's own CO2..." ↳ “own” = Scope 1 and 2 only ↳ excludes 99% of the CO2: Scope 3 ↳ no jet fuel, take offs, or landings are included 4. and finally: "net-zero." ↳ net zero ≠ zero ↳ CO2 is still produced, just a lot less ↳ this is usually achieved with offsets & cuts 5. "Our path to a carbon-free future" ↳ nothing is carbon-free ↳ even renewables need steel, cement, or rare earths ↳ this is a slogan, not a scientific claim Don't get me wrong - I support real actions to a cleaner future. But there is a fine line with misleading consumers. It took me 1 hour to unpack this, and I've worked in sustainability for 11 years. What will a regular passenger think? Anyway.. I have more like these... Should I just keep going? 😂 PS: Yes, I fly, sometimes. I’m not perfect. But at least I don’t run ads calling it sustainable. #sustainability #climatechange #circulareconomy

One image just disrupted a £22 billion fashion empire more effectively than a thousand sustainability reports. 🔥 This isn't an official SHEIN campaign gone wrong. It's artist Emanuele Morelli's AI creation—a haunting visualisation showing what fast fashion's "affordability" really costs us. The image speaks volumes: a SHEIN billboard where the model's flowing dress transforms into a cascade of textile waste. Art communicating what statistics alone cannot. 5 uncomfortable truths this image forces us to confront: 1. The scale of fashion waste is staggering → 92 million tonnes of textile waste produced annually  → The equivalent of one rubbish lorry of textiles dumped every second  → Most fast fashion items designed to be worn fewer than 10 times 2. The business model depends on our amnesia → Constantly changing trends keep us buying  → Ultra-low prices remove financial friction  → Digital marketing creates artificial scarcity and FOMO  → We're trained to forget yesterday's purchases 3. The true cost isn't on the price tag → Environmental damage from production chemicals  → Microplastics shedding into water systems  → Supply chain ethics compromised for speed and cost  → Communities near production sites bearing health consequences 4. Our definition of "affordable" is broken → When clothing is cheaper than a coffee, someone else is paying  → True cost spread across communities, environments, and future generations  → Psychological cost of constant consumption never factored in 5. Solutions exist but require systemic change → Circular fashion models gaining traction  → Rental and resale markets growing rapidly  → Consumer awareness rising but needs to translate to behaviour While SHEIN isn't the only culprit in the fast fashion ecosystem, Morelli's artwork throws a spotlight on an uncomfortable reality we've normalised. What we wear reflects our values more than our taste. What is your wardrobe saying about yours? Image: Emanuele Morelli ♻️ Found this helpful? Repost to share with your network.  ⚡ Want more content like this? Hit follow Maya Moufarek.

🌍 How can humanity continue to develop without destroying the foundations of life on Earth? A major new study, co-authored by the PIK - Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, charts a scientific path forward — and warns of the cost of inaction. Business-as-usual leads to ongoing deterioration in climate, biodiversity, freshwater, and nutrient cycles. But when ambitious climate policy is paired with systemic sustainability measures — like shifting to a low-meat diet, halving food waste, reforesting land, and managing water and nutrients efficiently — the damage can be halted, even reversed. By 2050, the planet can return to 2015-level conditions. By 2100, Earth systems could begin to recover significantly. 🧭 This study combines the planetary boundaries framework with integrated climate models to create a navigation system for decision-makers. At the World Meteorological Organization (WMO), we emphasize the power of climate services — turning science into actionable policy — to help countries and companies manage these risks, anticipate disruptions, and build long-term resilience. We need coordinated global action, driven by data and grounded in science. Because protecting our future means safeguarding the systems that sustain life. The tools are here. The science is clear. The time is now. https://lnkd.in/eVuR9yDu

How do we know if we’re actually becoming an AI-first company? That’s the question two customers asked me this week—and it’s a really fair one. AI buzz is everywhere, but how do you know if you’re making real progress? Here are 5 metrics every company should track to measure whether they’re truly on the path to becoming AI-first: 1. Revenue per Employee (Lagging Indicator) The ultimate test of success with AI: are you generating more value for every employee you hire? AI should amplify output, not just automate tasks. When each person drives more revenue, you know productivity is compounding. 👉 It's the north star, but it takes time to move. 2. Customer Satisfaction (CSAT) (Lagging Indicator) AI-driven productivity is meaningless if customer experience suffers. CSAT should hold steady—or better yet, improve—as AI delivers faster, smarter, more personalized service. 👉 If it drops, your AI strategy is likely misaligned with customer needs. 3. % of Teams with Access to AI Tools (Leading Indicator) You can’t be AI-first if your teams aren’t equipped. Measure how many employees have easy access to approved AI tools and whether those tools are embedded in their daily workflow. 👉 Access is the foundation. No access, no adoption. 4. Active AI Usage (Daily/Weekly) by Team (Leading Indicator) This is where the rubber meets the road. Track actual usage. Who’s using AI every day or week? What teams are lagging behind? 👉 To be AI-first, every team should be using AI every week—if not every day. 5. % of Work Carried Out by Agents (by Function) (Leading Indicator) This is the most transformational shift. What % of your team’s output is now driven by agents or AI copilots? In marketing, it could be content drafting. In sales, meeting booking. In support, ticket resolution. 👉 When agents do the work, your people focus on higher-leverage thinking—and the flywheel starts turning. Bottom line: Becoming AI-first isn't about buying tools, it’s about changing how work gets done. When you combine these 5 metrics, you get a clear picture of progress—and the compounding path toward higher productivity, better outcomes, and real transformation. What would you add to the list?

Consolidation of Sustainability Reporting Standards 🌎 The landscape of sustainability reporting is shifting towards greater clarity and consistency. With multiple frameworks guiding corporate disclosures, the integration of these standards is key to easing the reporting process for companies and enhancing transparency for investors. The International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB) is at the forefront of this effort, aligning with established frameworks like the Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) to streamline reporting guidelines. This alignment makes it easier for companies to report climate risks in a standardized format, improving consistency across the board. The International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) Foundation plays a critical role by merging several reporting frameworks, including the Climate Disclosure Standards Board (CDSB) and the Value Reporting Foundation (VRF). This consolidation reduces complexity, allowing companies to focus on one core set of standards rather than navigating multiple, overlapping guidelines. The Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) complements the work of ISSB by offering additional insights into social and governance factors. Together, these frameworks help companies address a full range of sustainability topics while maintaining compatibility with financial reporting needs. The Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP) also provides a foundation for climate-related disclosures. By building on CDP’s standards, these integrated frameworks offer companies a unified approach to reporting their environmental impacts in a way that is accessible and useful for stakeholders. Overall, the consolidation of these standards not only simplifies reporting but also promotes interoperability, enabling companies to share consistent, reliable data that meets global expectations. This unified approach is essential in building trust and transparency across industries and driving sustainable business practices. Source: IBM #sustainability #sustainable #business #esg #climatechange #climateaction #reporting

🌍 We Can’t Afford to Get Climate Policy Wrong—A Look at the Data Behind What Really Works 🌍 In the race against time to combat climate change, bold promises are everywhere. But here’s the critical question: Are the policies being implemented actually reducing emissions at the scale we need? A groundbreaking study published in Science, cuts through the noise and delivers the insights we desperately need. Evaluating 1,500 climate policies from around the world, the research identifies the 63 most effective ones—policies that have delivered tangible, significant reductions in emissions. What’s striking is that the most successful strategies often involve combinations of policies, rather than single initiatives. Think of it as the ultimate teamwork: when policies like carbon pricing, renewable energy mandates, and efficiency standards are combined thoughtfully, the impact is far greater than any one policy could achieve on its own. It’s a powerful reminder that for climate solutions the whole is indeed greater than the sum of its parts. Moreover, the study’s use of counterfactual emissions pathways is a game changer. By showing what would have happened without these policies, it provides a clear, quantifiable measure of their effectiveness. This is exactly the kind of rigorous evaluation we need to ensure that every policy counts, especially when we’re working against the clock. If we’re serious about meeting the Paris Agreement’s targets, we need to focus on what works—and this research offers a clear roadmap. Let’s champion policies that have proven to make a difference, because we don’t have time to waste on anything less. 🔗 Full study in the comments #ClimateAction #Sustainability #PolicyEffectiveness #ParisAgreement #NetZero #ClimateScience

#AntimicrobialResistance (AMR) threatens to send the world back into the era before antibiotics and other antimicrobials, when a routine infection could be deadly.     Already, an estimated 5 million people die every year from infections associated with AMR.    Over the next decade, AMR could reduce global life expectancy by 1.8 years and cost the global economy more than $800 billion annually, due to additional health costs and lost productivity.     It’s fueled by many factors:  1. Poorly functioning health systems 2. Weak regulation 3. Sub-standard practices in industrial farming and agriculture 4. Poor management of waste and wastewater      AMR disproportionately affects people in low and middle-income countries, and is closely linked to poverty and a lack of access to adequate water, sanitation and hygiene.     Later this month, the World Health Assembly will consider how to accelerate action in the human health sector, as part of a multi-sectoral #OneHealth approach.     The World Health Organization has outlined six recommendations for consideration: 1. Leadership and governance, based on effective and well-resourced coordination that includes all relevant stakeholders, and high-level oversight.   2. Allocation of domestic and international funding for accelerated national, regional and global action.   3. Evidence for action through strengthening AMR and antimicrobial use surveillance, strengthening bacteriology laboratory systems, research and sharing and use of data.    4. Accelerated implementation of a people-centred public health approach to address AMR, with a core package of interventions at all levels of health systems.    5. Scaling up learning, experience sharing and technical support for countries;    6. Promotion of science, research, and innovation, targeted to public health needs and to ensuring equitable access.   From communities to health workers. From youth organizations to parliamentarians.     From the private sector to people directly affected by drug-resistant infections and their consequences.    By working together, we can chart a clear path towards a safer world for all. 

The European Commission has introduced a new carbon tax on imported goods called the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM). This is meant to make sure that European companies and companies from other parts of the world are on the same page when it comes to carbon pricing and environmental commitments. Here are the main changes: 🔴 Emissions Reporting: Starting in October this year, companies have to start keeping track of how much carbon is linked to the goods they import. They need to start reporting this data by January 2024. This reporting will continue until the end of 2025. 🔴 Carbon Leakage Prevention: CBAM is a way to prevent companies from moving their production to places with weaker environmental rules to avoid carbon costs. It makes sure that European products and products made outside of Europe have similar carbon costs. 🔴 CBAM Certificates: Importers have to get CBAM certificates to match the carbon pricing between EU and non-EU products. They need to provide details about the product's carbon footprint, where it's from, how it's made, and its emissions data. This includes emissions during production and indirect emissions, like electricity use. 🔴 Covered Sectors: CBAM applies to industries with high carbon emissions like iron and steel, cement, fertilisers, aluminium, electricity, hydrogen, and some downstream products like screws and bolts. It also covers certain indirect emissions under certain conditions. Importers mainly need to report emissions during the transition phase until 2026. To help importers and producers outside of the EU adapt, the EU Commission is providing guidelines and tools to calculate emissions. They're also offering training materials and webinars. Some important data points to consider: 🟢 Carbon Leakage: A study by the European Environmental Bureau warns that unchecked carbon leakage could cause a 15% increase in global emissions, undermining climate efforts. CBAM aims to prevent this. 🟢 Emissions Differences: The World Trade Organization says that different countries have different emissions rules, leading to different carbon costs. CBAM aims to make this fairer. 🟢 Economic Impact: The European Commission estimates that the global carbon allowance market could be worth €4.5 billion per year by 2030. CBAM will significantly affect international trade and revenues. 🟢 Industry Shift: A study by the European Parliament Research Service shows that without CBAM, high-emission industries might move to places with weaker rules, leading to job losses and less competitiveness in the EU. 🟢 Green Transition: The International Monetary Fund says that well-designed carbon pricing like CBAM can encourage industries to become more environmentally friendly, contributing to a greener global economy. 🟢 Regulatory Challenges: CBAM's reporting requirements might be tough for importers initially. However, the long-term benefits of fair carbon pricing are expected to outweigh the challenges.