Insights Blog
-- Browse All Articles --
Physics Articles
Math Articles
Education Articles
Bio/Chem/Tech Articles
Forums
Classical Physics
Quantum Physics
Quantum Interpretations
Special and General Relativity
Atomic and Condensed Matter
Nuclear and Particle Physics
Beyond the Standard Model
Cosmology
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Other Physics Topics
Trending
Log in
Register
What's new
Classical Physics
Quantum Physics
Quantum Interpretations
Special and General Relativity
Atomic and Condensed Matter
Nuclear and Particle Physics
Beyond the Standard Model
Cosmology
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Other Physics Topics
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
More options
Style variation
System
Light
Dark
Contact us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Physics
Quantum Physics
Dirac Notation for Operators: Ambiguity in Expectation Values?
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="vanhees71, post: 6875841, member: 260864"] For a pure state, represented by a normalized vector ##|\Psi \rangle## expectation value is $$\langle f(\hat{A}) = \langle \Psi|f(\hat{A}) \Psi \rangle=\langle f(\hat{A})^{\dagger} \Psi|\Psi \rangle,$$ for an arbitrary function ##f(\hat{A})##. It doesn't matter whether the operator is self-adjoint or not for the identity of the two expressions. Of course, such an operator cannot represent an observable to begin with, and you might argue that it doesn't make sense to call this expression an "expectation value" in the first place. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Post reply
Forums
Physics
Quantum Physics
Dirac Notation for Operators: Ambiguity in Expectation Values?
Back
Top