Other Where and how can I submit my first paper? (Not an Expert)

  • Thread starter Thread starter QassimQQ
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Paper
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around the author's uncertainty about the publishability of their project, which involves a correction to space flight based on a specific phenomenon. After two and a half years of irregular work, the author is writing a paper and conducting computational comparisons but is unsure if the work is significant enough for publication. They express concerns about needing expert endorsement to upload to Arxiv and mention a lack of mentorship at their university, where relevant faculty are not engaged with this specific topic. Feedback from peers suggests that while mentorship is beneficial, it is not strictly necessary for feedback on the paper's form and style. The author contemplates whether to publish on Arxiv before submitting to a journal, with advice leaning towards waiting for journal feedback first, as Arxiv serves to disseminate work quickly and provide access to those without journal subscriptions.
QassimQQ
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone,I have been working on a project for the last two and half years-maybe three (irregularly), since I was an undergraduate. I nearly finished the project, and I am not sure if it is worth publishing or not.

It is a correction to a space flight using one specific phenomena. As far as I know, no one published something similar. Of course, the project is based on other papers, but they did not include the correction in their articles explicitly.

I think the correction is actually easy and not very hard. I am not sure if it is actually publishable. I am currently writing the paper and making a computational comparison.

You might ask why I took two and half years.
1- I was not rushing.
2- I am not expert in the field, so I had to read a lot of papers, wiki's and book pages. I needed time to understand what I am doing and crystallize the idea.
3- I had my BSc to finish ^^".
4- It is my first ever experience reading articles and developing my own ideas.

All in all, my project is not a breakthrough or anything its just a semi-empirical correction using a well known phenomena.

How to know whether my work is publishable or not? I thought about at least uploading it to Arxiv, but it seems that I need an endorsement from an expert or something like that.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The best would be for you to find someone at your university to look at it.
 
DrClaude said:
The best would be for you to find someone at your university to look at it.

No one is working on this specific type of problems in my university. There are professors in astrophysics and space science, but they do not work on this type of problems.

I approached one of the professors when I first started and he was not very enthusiastic about it. That's why I am working alone without a mentor in the first place.

Saying that, I think the project has changed a lot in these two years, I will try to approach him again. Thank you for your reply.
 
QassimQQ said:
No one is working on this specific type of problems in my university. There are professors in astrophysics and space science, but they do not work on this type of problems.

I approached one of the professors when I first started and he was not very enthusiastic about it. That's why I am working alone without a mentor in the first place.

Saying that, I think the project has changed a lot in these two years, I will try to approach him again. Thank you for your reply.
I don't think that the professor has to be an expert in the field. What you mostly need is feedback on the form and style of the paper. When it is up to the level of a publishable paper, you can submit it to a journal in the field, and then you can get some feedback about its content.
 
  • Like
Likes QassimQQ
DrClaude said:
I don't think that the professor has to be an expert in the field. What you mostly need is feedback on the form and style of the paper. When it is up to the level of a publishable paper, you can submit it to a journal in the field, and then you can get some feedback about its content.

That is reasonable.
If I am completely finished writing the paper/project and I am about to submit it to a journal, should I publish it on Arxiv giving that it is my first paper, which might turn out badly (rejected)?
 
QassimQQ said:
That is reasonable.
If I am completely finished writing the paper/project and I am about to submit it to a journal, should I publish it on Arxiv giving that it is my first paper, which might turn out badly (rejected)?
The arXiv is basically for fast dissemination of papers or to allow those without a subscription to the journal to still have access to your work. I would wait for some feedback from the journal before putting your article on the arXiv.
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman and QassimQQ
Given the current funding situation, you should contact potential departments or research groups before you apply and pay any application fees. Many programs are not taking new graduate students at all this cycle because of funding uncertainty, unless a specific advisor can show they already have money to support you for five years. This is what I’ve heard directly from 20–30 programs. Do not waste money applying blindly.

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K