It is the only one that currently appears to _for this bug_.
Kevin
----- Original Message -----
From: "Andrew Dunstan" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2005 11:57 AM
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] RESULT_OID Bug
>
>
> Andrew - Supernews wrote:
>
>>On 2005-07-27, Michael Fuhr <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>So far the problem does seem to be specific to whatever PL/pgSQL's
>>>is doing, and it affects ROW_COUNT as well as RESULT_OID. I haven't
>>>been able to reproduce the problem with PL/Tcl or with C and SPI.
>>>
>>
>>src/pl/plpgsql/src/pl_exec.c, function exec_stmt_getdiag, uninitialized
>>variable "isnull".
>>
>>
>
> nice catch. I see the "= false" removed in about 5 places in this change:
> http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/pl/plpgsql/src/pl_exec.c.diff?r1=1.146;r2=1.147
>
> Is this the only one that matters?
>
> cheers
>
> (another) andrew
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
>
