pgsql-hackers before 2020-04-15 00:00

The PostgreSQL developers team lives here. Discussion of current development issues, problems and bugs, and proposed new features. If your question cannot be answered by people in the other lists, and it is likely that only a developer will know the answer, you may re-post your question in this list. You must try elsewhere first!

Search the Archives

(enter a message-id to go directly to that message)
Advanced Search

Browse Archives

Prev | Next
Jump to day: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30

April 13, 2020

Thread Author Time
Re: [patch] some PQExpBuffer are not destroyed in pg_dump Masahiko Sawada 07:51
Re: pgbench - test whether a variable exists 📎 Fabien COELHO 07:54
Re: Issues with replication slots(which created manually) against logical replication Masahiko Sawada 08:12
[bug] Table not have typarray when created by single user mode wenjing 08:25
Re: [Proposal] Global temporary tables 曾文旌 08:27
Re: doc review for parallel vacuum Justin Pryzby 08:30
Re: [Proposal] Global temporary tables tushar 08:37
Re: Corruption during WAL replay Andres Freund 08:40
Re: pg_basebackup, manifests and backends older than ~12 Kyotaro Horiguchi 08:49
Re: weird hash plan cost, starting with pg10 Richard Guo 09:07
Re: Vacuum o/p with (full 1, parallel 0) option throwing an error 📎 Amit Kapila 09:24
Re: doc review for parallel vacuum 📎 Amit Kapila 09:52
Re: Corruption during WAL replay Masahiko Sawada 09:53
Re: [Proposal] Global temporary tables tushar 10:32
Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of large in-progress transactions Kuntal Ghosh 10:44
Re: Vacuum o/p with (full 1, parallel 0) option throwing an error Masahiko Sawada 10:52
Re: WAL usage calculation patch Amit Kapila 11:46
Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of large in-progress transactions Dilip Kumar 11:50
Re: Vacuum o/p with (full 1, parallel 0) option throwing an error Amit Kapila 12:25
Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of large in-progress transactions Kuntal Ghosh 12:41
Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of large in-progress transactions Dilip Kumar 13:04
Re: WAL usage calculation patch Julien Rouhaud 13:37
Re: weird hash plan cost, starting with pg10 Tom Lane 13:53
wrong relkind error messages 📎 Peter Eisentraut 13:54
Re: where should I stick that backup? Bruce Momjian 13:59
Re: where should I stick that backup? Robert Haas 14:20
Re: execExprInterp() questions / How to improve scalar array op expr eval? James Coleman 14:40
Re: spin_delay() for ARM Amit Khandekar 14:45
Re: spin_delay() for ARM Amit Khandekar 14:46
Re: [bug] Table not have typarray when created by single user mode Tom Lane 14:51
Re: pg_validatebackup -> pg_verifybackup? Robert Haas 14:56
Re: wrong relkind error messages Robert Haas 15:06
Re: pg_basebackup, manifests and backends older than ~12 Robert Haas 15:13
Re: wrong relkind error messages Tom Lane 15:13
Re: backup manifests Robert Haas 15:15
Re: wrong relkind error messages Andrew Dunstan 15:17
Re: cleaning perl code Andrew Dunstan 16:47
Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Tom Lane 17:13
Re: Properly mark NULL returns in numeric aggregates Jesse Zhang 17:34
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Robert Haas 17:37
documenting the backup manifest file format 📎 Robert Haas 17:40
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Erik Rijkers 17:52
Re: documenting the backup manifest file format Justin Pryzby 17:55
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Isaac Morland 17:57
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Alvaro Herrera 18:07
Re: documenting the backup manifest file format 📎 Robert Haas 18:08
Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of large in-progress transactions Kuntal Ghosh 18:13
Re: Properly mark NULL returns in numeric aggregates Tom Lane 18:13
Re: Parallel copy Robert Haas 18:13
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Tom Lane 18:27
Re: documenting the backup manifest file format Erik Rijkers 18:28
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Tom Lane 18:47
Re: documenting the backup manifest file format Alvaro Herrera 19:34
Using Oracle SQL Client commands with PSQL 12.2 DB Fred Richard 19:48
Re: documenting the backup manifest file format Robert Haas 19:51
Re: relcache leak warnings vs. errors Andres Freund 20:00
Re: documenting the backup manifest file format Andrew Dunstan 20:10
Re: documenting the backup manifest file format Robert Haas 20:14
Re: Using Oracle SQL Client commands with PSQL 12.2 DB Olivier Gautherot 20:15
Re: documenting the backup manifest file format Robert Haas 20:16
Re: Parallel copy Andres Freund 20:16
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Robert Haas 20:18
Re: Parallel copy Robert Haas 20:20
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Andrew Dunstan 20:20
Re: relcache leak warnings vs. errors Tom Lane 20:22
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Tom Lane 20:29
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? David G. Johnston 20:31
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Tom Lane 20:33
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Tom Lane 20:41
Re: documenting the backup manifest file format David Steele 20:42
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Tom Lane 20:57
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? David G. Johnston 21:20
Re: doc review for parallel vacuum Justin Pryzby 21:24
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? David G. Johnston 21:26
Re: documenting the backup manifest file format Alvaro Herrera 21:42
Re: pg_basebackup, manifests and backends older than ~12 Michael Paquier 22:26
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Jonathan S. Katz 22:33
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Corey Huinker 22:38
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? 📎 Tom Lane 22:44
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Corey Huinker 22:48
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Tom Lane 22:51
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Jonathan S. Katz 23:02
Re: pg_basebackup, manifests and backends older than ~12 Alvaro Herrera 23:04
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? 📎 Jonathan S. Katz 23:38
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Tom Lane 23:48
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Alvaro Herrera 23:50
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Tom Lane 23:55
Re: pg_basebackup, manifests and backends older than ~12 Robert Haas 23:55

April 14, 2020

Thread Author Time
Re: pg_basebackup, manifests and backends older than ~12 Michael Paquier 00:23
Re: pgbench - test whether a variable exists Michael Paquier 01:01
Re: [patch] some PQExpBuffer are not destroyed in pg_dump Michael Paquier 01:11
Re: wrong relkind error messages Michael Paquier 01:32
Re: Race condition in SyncRepGetSyncStandbysPriority Tom Lane 01:34
Re: 001_rep_changes.pl stalls Noah Misch 01:38
Re: 001_rep_changes.pl stalls Tom Lane 01:45
Re: weird hash plan cost, starting with pg10 Richard Guo 01:50
Re: relcache leak warnings vs. errors Michael Paquier 01:57
Re: Vacuum o/p with (full 1, parallel 0) option throwing an error Michael Paquier 02:22
Should program exit, When close() failed for O_RDONLY mode Lin, Cuiping 02:32
Re: Corruption during WAL replay Kyotaro Horiguchi 02:35
Re: doc review for parallel vacuum Amit Kapila 02:53
Re: [bug] Table not have typarray when created by single user mode wenjing 03:16
Re: Vacuum o/p with (full 1, parallel 0) option throwing an error Amit Kapila 03:25
Re: WAL usage calculation patch Amit Kapila 03:57
variation of row_number with parallel Rajkumar Raghuwanshi 03:58
Re: Race condition in SyncRepGetSyncStandbysPriority Masahiko Sawada 04:06
Re: variation of row_number with parallel Pavel Stehule 04:08
Re: variation of row_number with parallel Rajkumar Raghuwanshi 04:18
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Fabien COELHO 05:23
Re: Properly mark NULL returns in numeric aggregates 📎 David Rowley 05:46
Re: doc review for v13 Michael Paquier 05:47
Re: pgbench - test whether a variable exists Fabien COELHO 05:49
Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of large in-progress transactions Amit Kapila 06:34
index paths and enable_indexscan Amit Langote 06:43
Incremental sorts and EXEC_FLAG_REWIND Michael Paquier 06:53
Re: index paths and enable_indexscan Richard Guo 07:12
Re: pgsql: Improve handling of parameter differences in physical replicatio Peter Eisentraut 07:17
Re: PG compilation error with Visual Studio 2015/2017/2019 📎 davinder singh 07:37
Re: index paths and enable_indexscan Amit Langote 07:39
Display of buffers for planning time show nothing for second run Pavel Stehule 08:17
Re: Display of buffers for planning time show nothing for second run Julien Rouhaud 08:27
Re: index paths and enable_indexscan Andy Fan 08:29
Re: Display of buffers for planning time show nothing for second run Pavel Stehule 08:35
Re: Display of buffers for planning time show nothing for second run Amit Langote 08:40
Re: Display of buffers for planning time show nothing for second run Julien Rouhaud 08:49
Re: Display of buffers for planning time show nothing for second run Julien Rouhaud 08:54
Re: index paths and enable_indexscan Amit Langote 08:58
Re: Lexer issues Julien Rouhaud 09:00
Re: [PATCH] Keeps tracking the uniqueness with UniqueKey 📎 David Rowley 09:09
Re: index paths and enable_indexscan Andy Fan 09:12
Re: Index Skip Scan David Rowley 09:19
Re: index paths and enable_indexscan Andy Fan 09:20
Re: Display of buffers for planning time show nothing for second run Pavel Stehule 09:24
Re: Display of buffers for planning time show nothing for second run Pavel Stehule 09:26
Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of large in-progress transactions Amit Kapila 09:27
Re: Display of buffers for planning time show nothing for second run Julien Rouhaud 09:34
Re: Race condition in SyncRepGetSyncStandbysPriority Kyotaro Horiguchi 09:35
Re: Display of buffers for planning time show nothing for second run Pavel Stehule 09:45
Re: [HACKERS] make async slave to wait for lsn to be replayed Anna Akenteva 09:52
Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of large in-progress transactions 📎 Dilip Kumar 10:10
Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of large in-progress transactions Dilip Kumar 10:11
Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of large in-progress transactions Amit Kapila 10:27
Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of large in-progress transactions Dilip Kumar 10:36
Re: WIP/PoC for parallel backup 📎 Asif Rehman 12:33
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Andrew Dunstan 13:01
Re: WIP/PoC for parallel backup Kashif Zeeshan 13:32
While restoring -getting error if dump contain sql statements generated from generated.sql file tushar 13:41
Re: Race condition in SyncRepGetSyncStandbysPriority Tom Lane 13:52
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Andreas Karlsson 14:16
Re: where should I stick that backup? Robert Haas 14:16
Re: index paths and enable_indexscan Amit Langote 14:16
Re: index paths and enable_indexscan Tom Lane 14:20
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Tom Lane 14:29
Re: index paths and enable_indexscan Tom Lane 14:34
Re: WIP/PoC for parallel backup 📎 Asif Rehman 14:36
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Andreas Karlsson 14:39
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Tom Lane 14:52
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Robert Haas 14:59
Re: where should I stick that backup? Stephen Frost 15:08
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Tom Lane 15:26
Re: Properly mark NULL returns in numeric aggregates Jesse Zhang 15:31
Re: where should I stick that backup? Robert Haas 15:38
Re: Properly mark NULL returns in numeric aggregates Tom Lane 15:41
PG compilation error with Visual Studio 2015/2017/2019 Ranier Vilela 15:41
Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of large in-progress transactions Erik Rijkers 15:44
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Robert Haas 15:47
Re: cleaning perl code 📎 Andrew Dunstan 15:57
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Tom Lane 16:03
Re: [BUG] non archived WAL removed during production crash recovery 📎 Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais 16:03
Re: [BUG] non archived WAL removed during production crash recovery Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais 16:09
ERROR: could not determine which collation to use for string comparison Andreas Joseph Krogh 16:49
Re: documenting the backup manifest file format Robert Haas 16:56
Re: documenting the backup manifest file format David Steele 17:12
Re: sqlsmith crash incremental sort James Coleman 17:16
Re: documenting the backup manifest file format Alvaro Herrera 17:27
Re: documenting the backup manifest file format David Steele 17:33
Re: [bug] Table not have typarray when created by single user mode Alvaro Herrera 18:00
Re: index paths and enable_indexscan Robert Haas 18:43
Re: Do we need to handle orphaned prepared transactions in the server? Hamid Akhtar 19:00
Re: documenting the backup manifest file format Andrew Dunstan 19:03
Re: Corruption during WAL replay Teja Mupparti 19:04
Re: pg_basebackup, manifests and backends older than ~12 Robert Haas 19:13
Re: Do we need to handle orphaned prepared transactions in the server? Robert Haas 19:19
Re: documenting the backup manifest file format David Steele 19:19
Re: Parallel copy Kuntal Ghosh 19:40
Re: documenting the backup manifest file format Andrew Dunstan 19:55
Re: documenting the backup manifest file format David Steele 20:01
Re: documenting the backup manifest file format Alvaro Herrera 20:09
Re: documenting the backup manifest file format Alvaro Herrera 20:11
Re: Race condition in SyncRepGetSyncStandbysPriority 📎 Tom Lane 20:32
Re: documenting the backup manifest file format Andrew Dunstan 20:33
Re: documenting the backup manifest file format David Steele 20:40
Re: cleaning perl code Alvaro Herrera 20:44
Re: WIP/PoC for parallel backup Robert Haas 20:49
Re: ERROR: could not determine which collation to use for string comparison Tom Lane 21:31
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? David G. Johnston 22:28
Re: wrong relkind error messages Alvaro Herrera 22:36
Re: pg_basebackup, manifests and backends older than ~12 Michael Paquier 22:39
Re: pg_basebackup, manifests and backends older than ~12 Michael Paquier 22:41
Re: wrong relkind error messages Alvaro Herrera 23:02

Browse Archives

Prev | Next
Jump to day: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30