100% found this document useful (1 vote)
956 views11 pages

Accounting Students' Inventory Analysis

1. The document provides inventory information for Raleigh Department Store for 2009, 2010, and 2011 using three different inventory valuation methods: conventional retail, LIFO retail, and dollar-value LIFO retail. 2. Under conventional retail, the 2009 ending inventory is $324,500 at cost and $540,000 at retail. Under LIFO retail, the 2009 ending inventory is $324,500 at cost and $50,000 at retail. 3. Using dollar-value LIFO retail, the 2010 ending inventory is $33,662 at cost and $56,100 at retail prices. The 2011 ending inventory is $28,060 at cost and $46,000 at retail prices.

Uploaded by

dbjn
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLS, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
100% found this document useful (1 vote)
956 views11 pages

Accounting Students' Inventory Analysis

1. The document provides inventory information for Raleigh Department Store for 2009, 2010, and 2011 using three different inventory valuation methods: conventional retail, LIFO retail, and dollar-value LIFO retail. 2. Under conventional retail, the 2009 ending inventory is $324,500 at cost and $540,000 at retail. Under LIFO retail, the 2009 ending inventory is $324,500 at cost and $50,000 at retail. 3. Using dollar-value LIFO retail, the 2010 ending inventory is $33,662 at cost and $56,100 at retail prices. The 2011 ending inventory is $28,060 at cost and $46,000 at retail prices.

Uploaded by

dbjn
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLS, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Student Name: Instructor Class: McGraw-Hill/Irwin Problem 09-01 THE DECKER COMPANY Inventory Requirement 1: (1) (2) Ceiling

(3) Floor Designated Market Value [Middle value of (1), (2) & (3)] $ 12,000 8,800 2,160 800 6,630 $ 30,390
Correct!

(4)

(5)

Product A B C D E

Units 1,000 800 600 200 600

RC 12,000 8,800 1,200 800 7,200

NRV 13,600 12,240 4,080 1,020 6,630

NRV-NP $ 7,200 6,480 2,160 540 3,510 Totals

Cost 10,000 12,000 1,800 1,400 8,400 33,600


Correct!

Inventory Value [Lower of (4) and (5)] $ 10,000 8,800 1,800 800 6,630 $ 28,030
Correct!

Inventory carrying value: Requirement 2: Inventory carrying value: Loss from inventory write-down:

28,030

- Correct!

$ $

30,390 3,210

- Correct!

Given Data P09-01: THE DECKER COMPANY Unit Selling Price $16 18 8 6 13 15% 40%

Product A B C D E

Quantity 1,000 800 600 200 600

Unit Cost $10 15 3 7 14

Unit RC $12 11 2 4 12

Sales commission Normal profit as percentage of selling price

Student Name: Instructor Class: McGraw-Hill/Irwin Problem 09-05 Requirement 1: ALQUIST COMPANY Conventional Retail Method Cost 100,000 1,387,500 10,000 Retail 150,000 2,000,000 300,000 2,450,000 61.12% (150,000) 2,300,000 (15,000) 1,750,000 250,000

Beginning inventory Plus: Purchases Freight-in Plus: Net markups Cost-to-retail percentage: Less: Net markdowns Goods available for sale Less: Normal shrinkage Sales: Sales to customers Sales to employees Employee discounts Estimated ending inventory at retail Estimated ending inventory at cost Estimated cost of goods sold

1,497,500

(2,000,000) (62,500) 222,500 (135,992) $ 1,361,508


- Correct! - Correct!

- Correct!

Requirement 2: ALQUIST COMPANY LIFO Retail Method Cost 100,000 1,387,500 10,000 Retail 150,000 2,000,000 300,000 (150,000) 2,150,000 2,300,000

Beginning inventory Plus: Purchases Freight-in Plus: Net markups Less: Net markdowns Goods available for sale (excluding beg. inv.) Goods available for sale (including beg. inv.) Cost to retail percentage: Less: Normal shrinkage Sales: Sales to customers Sales to employees Employee discounts Estimated ending inventory at retail Estimated ending inventory at cost: Beginning inventory Current period's layer Total Estimated cost of goods sold

1,397,500 1,497,500 65%

(15,000) $ 1,750,000 250,000

(2,000,000) (62,500) 222,500 Cost 100,000 47,125 147,125

- Correct!

$ $

Retail 150,000 72,500 222,500

$ $

(147,125) $ 1,350,375

- Correct!

Given Data P09-05: ALQUIST COMPANY 2011 operations information: Beginning inventory cost, 1/1/2011 Beginning inventory retail value, 1/1/2011 2011 Purchases cost 2011 Purchases retail value Incoming freight costs Outgoing freight costs Net additional. markups Net markdowns Shrinkage estimate Employee discount Employee sales Customer sales $ 100,000 $ 150,000 $ 1,387,500 $ 2,000,000 $ 10,000 $ 25,000 $ 300,000 $ 150,000 $ 15,000 20% $ 250,000 $ 1,750,000

Student Name: Instructor Class: McGraw-Hill/Irwin Problem 09-06 Requirement 1: GRAND DEPARTMENT STORE, INC. Conventional Retail Method Cost 20,000 $ 100,151 5,100 (2,100) Retail 30,000 146,495 (2,800) 2,235 175,930

Beginning inventory Plus: Purchases Freight-in Less: Purchase returns Plus: Net markups Cost-to-retail percentage: Less: Net markdowns Goods available for sale Less: Normal spoilage Net sales Estimated ending inventory at retail Estimated ending inventory at cost 70.00%

123,151
Correct!

(800) 175,130 (4,500) (135,730) 34,900


Correct!

$ $ 24,430
Correct!

Requirement 2: The difference between the inventory estimate per retail method and the amount per the physical count may be due to: 1. Theft losses.

2. Spoilage or breakage above normal.

3. Differences in cost-to-retail percentage for purchases during the month, beginning inventory, and ending inventory. 4. Markups on goods available for sale inconsistent between cost of goods sold and ending inventory.

5. A wide variety of merchandise with varying cost-to-retail percentages.

6. Incorrect reporting of markdowns, additional markups or cancellations.

Given Data P09-06: GRAND DEPARTMENT STORE, INC. October, 2011 operations information: Beginning inventory at cost, 10/1/2011 Beginning inventory at retail, 10/1/2011 Purchases at cost Purchases at retail Freight-in Purchase returns at cost Purchase returns at retail Additional. markups Markup cancellations Net markdowns Normal spoilage and breakage Sales $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 20,000 30,000 100,151 146,495 5,100 2,100 2,800 2,500 265 800 4,500 135,730

Student Name: Instructor Class: McGraw-Hill/Irwin Problem 09-10 Requirement 1: RALEIGH DEPARTMENT STORE Conventional Retail Method Cost 27,500 $ 282,000 26,500 (6,500) (5,000) Retail 45,000 490,000 (10,000) 25,000 550,000 59% (10,000) 540,000 (487,000) (3,000) 50,000
Correct!

Beginning inventory Plus: Purchases Freight-in Less: Purchase returns Purchase discounts Plus: Net markups Cost-to-retail percentage: Less: Net markdowns Goods available for sale Less: Net sales Employee discounts Estimated ending inventory at retail Estimated ending inventory at cost

324,500

$ $ 29,500
Correct!

Requirement 2: RALEIGH DEPARTMENT STORE LIFO Retail Method Cost 27,500 $ 282,000 26,500 (6,500) (5,000) Retail 45,000 490,000 (10,000) 25,000 (10,000) 495,000 540,000

Beginning inventory Plus: Purchases Freight-in Less: Purchase returns Purchase discounts Plus: Net markups Less: Net markdowns Goods available for sale (excl. beg. inv.) Goods available for sale (incl. beg. inv.) Cost-to-retail percentage Less: Net sales Employee discounts Less Net Sales Estimated ending inventory at retail Estimated ending inventory at cost: Beginning inventory Current period's layer Total $ $

$ 60%

297,000 324,500

$ Retail 45,000 5,000 50,000


Correct!

(487,000) (3,000) 50,000


Correct!

$ $

Cost 27,500 3,000 30,500


Correct!

Student Name: Instructor Class: McGraw-Hill/Irwin Problem 09-10 Requirement 3: RALEIGH DEPARTMENT STORE Dollar-Value LIFO Retail Method Ending Inventory at Base Year Retail Prices $ 55,000 Inventory Inventory Layers Layers at Base Year Converted To Retail Prices Cost $ 30,500 3,162 33,662
Correct!

Ending Inventory at Year-end Retail Prices 2010 $ 56,100

50,000 $ 5,000 Total ending inventory at dollar-value LIFO retail cost $

2011 48,300

$ 46,000 $ 46,000 $ Total ending inventory at dollar-value LIFO retail cost $

28,060 28,060
Correct!

Given Data P09-10: RALEIGH DEPARTMENT STORE 1/1/09 inventory retail value 1/1/09 inventory cost Transactions during 2009: Gross purchases Purchase returns Purchase discounts Gross sales Sales returns Employee discounts Freight-in Net markups Net markdowns 12/31/10 inventory retail value Cost-to-retail percentage under LIFO retail method Appropriate price index of the January 1, 2010 price level 12/31/11 inventory retail value Cost-to-retail percentage under LIFO retail method Appropriate price index of the January 1, 2010 price level $ Cost 282,000 6,500 5,000 $ Retail 490,000 10,000 492,000 5,000 3,000 26,500 25,000 10,000 $ 56,100 62% 102% 48,300 61% 105% $ $ 45,000 27,500

You might also like